- Open Access
Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass––a contribution to power Africa
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 February 2017
Accepted: 7 July 2017
Published: 1 August 2017
Worldwide efforts are being made to increase the use of renewable energy in order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. Africa is blessed with abundant resources of fossil fuels as well as renewable energy resources. Yet the continent, especially sub-Saharan Africa, is afflicted with power crisis. For example, in Nigeria, erratic electricity supplies will persist unless the government diversifies her energy sources and adopt new technologies available in the electricity generation sector. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) has called for promotion of increased utilization of the continent’s vast renewable energy resources to accelerate development. This review examines the perspective of renewable energy from biomass as an important strategy for a sustainable development in Nigeria. The paper also addresses the use of pyrolysis technology––an efficient thermo-chemical process for energy applications. However, the study presents on applications either to replace fossil fuel in an existing diesel engine-based power generation system or to generate electricity using a gas engine. The work also presented herein addresses the use of industrial- and non-industrial-derived biomass residues for energy purposes with specific example on solid palm oil residues in Nigeria. The current status of pyrolysis technology and its potential for commercial application for bio-fuel production using microwave-assisted pyrolysis in Nigeria are presented. This study will extensively review the recent work on microwave-assisted technology applied to the pyrolysis process. It is estimated that electrical power generation potential at about 500 MW can be obtained by using only the available residues from oil palm industry in Nigeria. This potential can be increased 10-fold with more emphasis on expansion and modernization of oil palm industry in Nigeria. This will benefit in terms of higher revenue from the palm oil export as well as higher renewable energy generation from its biomass residue using the microwave-assisted pyrolysis technology.
Population is a major driver of energy demand and inadequate supply of energy constricts socio-economic activities, restricts economic growth, and adversely affects the quality of life. There is a correlation between electricity consumption and gross domestic product (GDP) of a nation. According to  sub-Saharan Africa has the highest population without electricity––about 640 million, rural electrification below par of 17% and yet, the region is known to have sufficient non-fossil and fossil energy resources largely unharnessed. The current energy production capacity has failed to support economic growth, infrastructural development, and in elevating living standards [4–6]. This makes many sub-Saharan Africa-based industries and manufacturing sectors uncompetitive and drags down annual GDP growth. For instance,  in their study on the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Nigeria covering periods 1980–2008 found that there was bidirectional causality between the two. To fulfill the economic and social growth of the region, the ability of government to develop the huge electricity capacity deficit is very crucial. The mission to widen access to modern energy services has been influential in shaping some of the discussions on energy at the international level. The year 2012 has been declared year of energy access and 2030 has been set as the year for achieving universal access to modern energy services. For the vast majority of African countries, lack of access to modern energy services constitutes a major obstacle in boosting industrial, agricultural, urban, and rural development. For many commercial enterprises, unreliable and costly supplies of electricity and modern fuels impede production, growth, and development.
Nigeria’s energy reserves and potentials (2005)
36.0 billion barrels
166 trillion SCFb
Coal and lignite
2.7 billion tonne
31 billion barrel
The demand for electricity in Nigeria for 2016 is estimated to be around 12,800 MW; however, the available capacity is only around 4500 MW––meets only one-third of the estimated demand . The supply of electricity has been erratic with hydro and thermal routes being the major contributor of the electricity generation. Africa has the lowest level of electrification rate in the developing world at 25%. In China, East Asia, and the Middle East, the electrification rate is around 91.8% compared to south Asia at 62.2% and Latin America at 93.4% . Average amount of electricity consumed per capita in Nigeria is 137 kWh, which is one of the lowest in the world . Taking into account the desire to improve electrification, many African countries are putting great importance on power generation and distribution. Further to the shortage of power generation, transmission and distribution losses are also higher in Africa compared to the world average (11.3% compared to 9.2%). These losses exceed 20% in Senegal, Kenya, and Tanzania and 40% in Nigeria and Congo . Despite the vast abundance of fossil fuels (oil and gas), the fossil fuels have only contributed 18.1% to the total primary energy consumption in Nigeria [12, 14]. The greater portion of the crude oil produced in the country is usually exported. In 2007, more than 98% of the crude oil extracted in the country was exported, leaving less than 2% for local consumption . Despite the ample coal, oil, and natural gas reserves, at the present rate of extraction, it has been estimated that these reserves, by the next 40 years, will be depleted to a point uneconomical to continue exploration. It therefore becomes imperative that alternative sources of energy are explored.
The electricity supply grid can be supplied with an increasing amount of electricity generated from sustainable and non-polluting sources.
The use of waste and biomass, or fuels derived from these, can be considered for transportation, heating and cooking, electricity production, and energy storage.
The use of combined heat and power (CHP), where the waste heat from electricity production is used for space and water heating or cooling (increasing fuel utilization often by a factor of two or more).
Due to the availability of efficient small scale renewable energy generating plant, it can be worthwhile to consider on-site electricity generation for own use, especially where there are exploitable local resources (biomass or waste fuel, and/or a local wind or solar resource).
In its Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , the IPCC draws the conclusion that renewable energy sources can play an important role in this transformation process. The urgent energy situation requires the current existing energy system to undertake both fundamental reforms by shifting to other energy resources and gradual improvements by adopting more advanced technologies for energy generation and production. A shift of primary energy resources from fossil fuels to renewable energy could greatly reduce the current heavy dependence upon fossil fuels. Renewable energy sources can be highly transient and exhibit strong short-term and seasonal variations in their energy outputs. Their variability poses problems for applications that require a continuous supply of energy . In addition, renewable resources typically have a low energy density, often large collection areas are required to generate modest power outputs. It has been projected that the production of liquid fuels from biomass will soar in the next 30 years irrespective of whether the oil prices are low or high; thus, new technologies must be developed for the efficient conversion of biomass to fuels that have high energy density and compatibility with the existing energy infrastructure . Two significant barriers impede widespread deployment of renewable energy, cost, and demand side servicing. While cost is an important factor, the variability related to the inherent temporal mismatch between resource availability (sun shining, wind blowing etc.) and the load poses a serious technical issue for the deployment of renewable energy. Power from these resources may not be available when required. For renewables to assume a role as a primary energy source, the availability issue must be addressed. One commonly quoted solution is to incorporate a broad mix of renewable sources. Countries like Denmark which have lead the way in incorporating renewable energy into their energy system have published energy plans which target 50% renewable by 2030 and 100% by 2050 . Currently, wind and solar power are assumed to be the key technologies in this development. However, their production fluctuates greatly over time (depending on changing weather patterns) and sites with high potential are often some distance from demand centers like cities. Lignocellulosic and other forms of biomass are some of the main renewable energy resources available and considered as promising alternative to provide the source of renewable liquid, gaseous, and solid fuels. It is the oldest source of energy used by humans, and it is able to supply all kinds of fuels, chemicals, and materials, which we currently obtain from petroleum, coal, or natural gas. The purpose of such review is to highlight the importance of renewable energy derived from biomass in complementing the present government of Nigeria’s effort to address the nations over dependence on its fossil fuels for federal revenues and energy mix.
Renewable energy potentials in Nigeria
Selection criteria for sustainable energy planning. From 
Efficiency, exergy efficiency, primary energy ratio, safety, reliability, maturity.
Investment cost, operation and maintenance cost, fuel cost, electric cost, net present value, payback period, service life, equivalent annual cost.
NOx emission, CO2 emission, CO emission, SO2 emission, particles emission, non-methane volatile organic compounds, land use, noise.
Social acceptability, job creation, social benefits.
The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) methodology (which is a multi-criteria decision-making) method developed by  has been used by other researchers to make a multi-criteria selection among alternative renewable energy options [23, 25–28]. AHP is effective in dealing with complex decision-making because it reduces complex decisions to a series of pairwise comparisons. It generates a weight for each evaluation criterion and scenario according to the information provided. The AHP combines the objective and scenario evaluations to determine a relative ranking of the scenarios. In one particular study using AHP to evaluate the best renewable energy technology,  reported that the multi-criteria decision analyses showed that the wind energy is the best renewable energy alternative. The ranking of the other alternatives in descending order were biomass, geothermal, solar, and hydropower. Also, the evaluation of criteria indicated that environmental effects are more important in this problem of technology selection. Renewable energy has considerable potential in Nigeria and could bridge the major energy gaps in rural areas, particularly northern Nigeria.
Renewable energy potentials in Nigeria––source 
91.4 million tons/year produced
245 million assorted animals in 2001
28.2 million hectares of arable land; 8.5 cultivated
43.4 million tons/year consumption
18.5 million tons produced in 2005 and now estimated at 0.5 kg/capita/day
15 MW dispersed solar PV installations (estimated)
2–4 m/s @ 10 m height mainland
Electronic wind information system (WIS) available
These REs could potentially facilitate in overcoming the energy supply deficit and also decrease emission level and improved living standard of the Nigeria people.
Solar energy potential is enormous in Nigeria, with fairly evenly distributed solar radiation averaging 19.8 MJ/m2/day−1 and an average of 6 h of sunshine a day; ranging between about 3.5 h at the coastal areas and 9.0 h at the far northern border areas . The country is also characterized with some cold and dusty atmospheric conditions during the Harmattan season, in its northern part, for a period of about 4 months (November-February) annually. The assumed potential for concentrated solar power and photovoltaic generation is around 427,000 MW .
Hydropower has been the very important for the grid-powered generation in Nigeria for decades. The country is reasonably endowed with large rivers and a few natural waterfalls. It is the second largest type of renewable energy available in Nigeria . The total potential of hydropower in Nigeria is about 14,750 MW. However, only 1930 MW (14%) of that potential is currently being generated, which represent about 30% of gross installed grid-connected electricity generation capacity of Nigeria . Small hydropower (SHP) has gained rapid consideration; this is due to its inherent advantages such as reduce cost and maintenance. Based on the 1980 survey, 734 MW of SHP can be harnessed from 277 sites, the potential of the SHP is estimated at 3500 MW, representing 23% of the Nigeria’s total hydropower potential [30, 31].
Wind energy potential is very modest, with annual average speeds of about 2.0 m/s in the coastal region and 4.0 m/s at heights of 30 m in the far north of the country . With an air density of 1.1 kg/m3, the wind energy intensity perpendicular to the wind directions ranges between 4.4 W/m at the coastal areas and 53.2 W/m at the far northern region of Nigeria . At present, the share of wind energy in the national energy consumption has remained very low with no wind power plants connected to the national grid.
Geothermal energy is a thermal energy generated and stored in the earth interior. Geothermal energy resource consists of thermal energy from the earth’s interior stored in hot dry rocks as well as rocks with trapped steam or liquid water. In Nigeria, the geothermal energy is not well exploit. Currently, there are two Known Geothermal Resources Areas (KGRAs) in Nigeria; the Ikogosi warm springs of Ondo state and the Wikki warm springs of Bauchi state .
Biomass fuels as renewable energy sources have increasingly been considered as a key option to substitute conventional fossil fuels. Conversion of biomass into renewable motor fuels, together with the associated environmental and geopolitical benefits, has driven considerable research in the area. The term biomass is commonly identified as biological material from living plant or dead plant. In the present context, biomass refers to dead trees, branches and tree stumps, yard clippings, off-cuts, wood chips, and agro residues. Biomass is considered as one of the renewable energy sources with the highest potential to contribute to the energy needs of modern society for both the industrialized and developing countries. While biomass is being used for cooking and heat, it is currently not being fully used to produce electricity in Nigeria [35, 36].
Lignocellulosic biomass and energy potential
The intermittency of renewable power sources such as wind and photovoltaic (PV) presents a major obstacle to their extensive penetration into the grid . The quest for renewable sustainable energy sources has given biomass a prominence it had lost during the industrial revolution after the discovery of convenient fossil fuels like coal and oil. Biomass defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC 2005)––“Is a non-fossilized and biodegradable organic material originating from plants, animals and micro-organisms. This shall also include products, by-products, residues and waste from agriculture, forestry and related industries as well as the non-fossilized and biodegradable organic fractions of industrial and municipal wastes.” On a comparative basis, biomass is considered carbon-neutral, meaning there is no addition to the CO2 inventory by the burning of biomass, which is also worthy to clarify against cutting trees for energy supply because they serve as a CO2 sink. A tree stops absorbing CO2 after it stops growing or dies. Similarly, if left alone on the forest floor, it can release CO2 through natural degradation or in a forest fire and even incomplete combustion as the case for household and cottage usage. Furthermore, a dead tree could release more harmful CH4 if left to decompose in water . Biomass comes in a variety of forms, which can be utilized as an energy resource. Loosely, biomass may also be classified into two broad groups: Virgin biomass includes lignocellulose (wood, plants, and leaves) and carbohydrates (crops and vegetables) and Waste biomass comprises municipal solid waste (solid and liquid wastes); sewage, animal, and human wastes; gases derived from landfilling (mainly methane); and agricultural wastes. Nigeria have in excess both types of biomass mentioned above; however, the present state of the Nigerian agricultural sector is overwhelmingly a small or medium scale production. The producers are not relishing the full scale production capacity and enhanced productivity because of the lack of basic amenities, finance, modern agricultural technology, and modern downstream processing technology.
Residues estimate from agricultural crops, 2010––source 
Production area (000 ha)
Production (000 ton)
Amount available million tons
Total energy available (PJ)
Empty fruit bunch
By direct combustion to provide heat for use in heating, for steam production, and hence, electricity generation.
By gasification to provide a fuel gas for combustion for heat, or in an engine or turbine for electricity generation.
By pyrolysis to provide a liquid fuel that can substitute for fuel oil in any static heating or electricity generation application.
Among various renewable energy resources, biomass-based power generation systems can provide grid quality steady power . It has been proposed that “bioenergy” (energy from biomass and waste) has the highest contribution among all renewable materials towards reducing a country’s carbon footprint and also fossil fuel dependence . The use of biomass as fuel in substitution of fossil resources results in low sulfur dioxide emissions and almost no net atmospheric carbon emissions, and hence serves to mitigate greenhouse gas and global climate change impacts. Biomass-based power plants operating throughout the year with plant load factors in excess of 70% are conceivable and this would make their performance comparable to centralized power stations . The possible contribution of biomass to future global energy supply ranges from below 100 EJ/year to over 400 EJ/year by 2050. As a matter of comparison, the global energy demand in 2010 reached 12,380 Mtoe in 2010, equivalent to 518 EJ . However, the current use of renewable sources for energy production is limited to an extent, which is considerably lower than their potential. This is mainly due to relatively high costs of the technologies for biofuel production from biomass. Modernized bioenergy systems are suggested to be important contributors to future sustainable energy systems and to sustainable development in industrialized countries as well as in developing countries like Nigeria.
Most of the studies consider biomass plantations as the most important source of biomass for energy (e.g., biomass plantation supply is forecast to be between 47 and 238 EJ/year by the year 2050) . [Note: 1 million tons of oil equivalent (Mtoe) = 4.2 × 10 16 J and 1 EJ = 23.9 Mtoe]. For a case in point and in the context of the Malaysian oil palm industry, which has become a key economic growth driver for the country with 4.69 million hectares of planted land, 416 mills, 50 refineries, and 17 Oleochemicals plants, garnered RM52.7 (US$13.5) billion in Gross National Income (GNI) in 2014 . Unquestionably, by emulating the success of the Malaysia oil palm industry, there can be of tremendous opportunities in supplying renewable energy and developmental growth in Nigeria via the agricultural waste biomass. Nigeria has significant potential to produce biofuels and even become an international supplier . Some researchers, while firmly advocating the use of solar PV, also suggest other sources of power using agriculture and municipal waste to generate biofuel must be undertaken aggressively .
Oil palm biomass and palm oil production residues
The palm oil mill plant is generally energy self-sufficient processing plant. Currently, relatively low efficient boilers are installed in mills to produce steam for sterilization, drying, and power generation. The wastes generated during the oil production process, mainly EFB, MF, and PKS are generally burnt as fuel in mill boilers to generate steam or hot gas for drying, sterilization, and power generation. The OPT and OPF generated during the replanting session can be problematic as the current method of leaving the dead tress between the rows of palm trees to naturally decompose for soil conservation, erosion control, and in the long-term nutrients recycling purpose; poses the risk of attracting harmful insect. The other method is to utilize them as soil fertilizer by burning. This will minimize the risk of attracting insects; however, it results in air pollution. A more efficient and environment-friendly utilization of the generated OPT and OPF during the replanting session is urgently needed. On the one hand, the success of the palm oil industry has generated economic benefits including poverty alleviation; however, it has received intense negative reviews. The fast expansion of oil palm plantations has raised issues about the industry sustainability and its impact on the environment . In the current waste management scenario for the palm oil industry, the biomass residues generated are underutilized. Therefore, there is a need to explore and evaluate various strategies to maximize the utilization of these biomass wastes produced in the plantations and mills to meet energy demands. This will reduce the cost of waste treatment and increase the profitability through the energy generated [60, 61].
Bioenergy from solid biomass residues of oil palm
Biomass is an important energy source to create a more sustainable society. Generally, there is large diversity of the biomass in nature. The composition and properties of biomass need to be improved to enable their application as sustainable fuel in highly efficient biomass to energy chains. Conventionally, the majority of biomass-derived electricity is produced using a steam cycle process, in which biomass is burned in a boiler to generate high-pressure steam, that flows over to cause a turbine to rotate, which in response produce electricity. Although biomass is an attractive renewable source of energy, it is generally difficult to handle, transport, store, and used due to its low homogeneity, low energy density, hygroscopic, and presence of non-combustible inorganic constituents (high alkali metal content; Na, K), which leads to problems such as deposition sintering, agglomeration, fouling, and corrosion in the energy conversion equipment [38, 62, 63]. Bioenergy conversion technologies are used to convert biomass into useful energy. These technologies are mainly divided into two categories: thermochemical and biochemical conversion. In thermochemical conversion pathways, heat and chemical catalysts are used for the production of energy from biomass, while biochemical conversion pathways use biological organisms and biological catalysts for transforming biomass into energy and value-added products. In most cases, it is important to pre-treat the biomass by physical and/or chemical means, producing a secure and affordable fuel alternative that satisfies the requirements for biochemical or thermochemical conversion processes, such as fermentation, combustion, gasification, pyrolysis, and others. Pre-treatment is perhaps the most crucial step as it has a large impact on the later steps of the biomass utilization processes .
Pyrolysis principles and mechanism
The three main thermo-chemical process of biomass
Biomass conversion process
Temperature range (°C)
Less than stoichiometric oxygen required
(The syngas produced through gasification is predominately carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide).
Flue gas and ash.
(Emissions of dioxins, furans).
Absent of oxygen
Bio-oil, syngas, char.
(The gases and the bio-oil are from the volatile fraction of biomass, while the char is mostly the fixed carbon component).
Pyrolysis involves the simultaneous change of chemical composition and physical phase and is irreversible. Pyrolysis techniques have been developed as an alternative to treat and convert waste materials to products suitable for use as a potential energy source. It offers the potential for greater efficiencies and less pollution for the production of reactive intermediate products from biomass in comparison with other techniques. Lignocellulosic feedstocks including virgin resources and residues such as wood, coffee hulls, rice straw, waste tea, wheat straw, sewage sludge, and automotive industry wastes including auto shredder residues showed high potentials as the raw materials for the pyrolysis process [64–73]. However, the efficient decomposition of the biomass components are strongly influenced on process parameters such as reactor configuration, heat transfer, temperature of reaction, and vapor residence time .
Typical operating parameters and products for pyrolysis process, source - 
Solid residence time (s)
Heating rate (K/s)
Particle size (mm)
Product yield (%)
Pyrolysis bio-oil; the liquid product is referred to many names including pyrolysis liquid, pyrolysis oil, tar, bio-crude oil, bio-oil, bio-fuel oil, pyroligneous tar, wood distillates, and liquid wood. This liquid fuel can substitute for fuel oil in any static heating or electricity generation or transport application. The liquid can also be used to produce a range of specialty and commodity chemicals (for flavoring of food, phenols––adhesives for wood, fertilizer, acetic acid, sugars, and also chemicals for other industrial applications).
Biochar; being a rigid amorphous carbon matrix solid, it is dominantly consist of carbon ~85% along with hydrogen and various inorganic species. Some of its applications studied by include used as solid fuel in boilers, for the production of activated carbon, in the field of nanotechnology for making nanotubes, producing hydrogen rich gas and more recently it is used as a microwave absorber in microwave-assisted reactions.
Syngas; analogous results have been reported in many other studies reviewed and reported by  that operated Internal Combustion (IC) engines with syngas. Sequel to all the developments, it is reported that commercial petrol and diesel engines can be easily converted to use gaseous fuel for the use of power generation, transportation, and other applications. Therefore, the syngas from biomass pyrolysis can be considered as a renewable alternative fuel for IC engines and industrial combustion routes.
Integrating microwave irradiation into pyrolysis is a novel alternative heating mechanism that has gained increasing attention in recent years. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP) has many advantages over three conventional heating, including uniform internal heating of comparatively larger particles size, instantaneous heating rates, produces fewer ashes in the liquid product as it does not require any agitations, no syngas dilution by the carrying gas, and easier technology implementation . Early work on the development of MAP used batch-type process that is characterized under intermediate rate pyrolysis. A key to obtaining higher yields and quality of pyrolysis oil lies in increasing the heating rate and consequentially reducing the reaction time. In recent researches and developments, carbonaceous materials such as charcoal, activated carbon, carbon, and pyrolysis char are used as microwave absorbers to enhance the heat and mass transfers [80, 81]. A microwave pyrolysis of wood sawdust and corn stover using SiC as microwave absorber by  showed that temperature can reach up to 960 °C. Very recently, study was carried out to observe the influence of conventional slow and microwave pyrolysis on products yield. The results revealed that the use of microwave irradiation boosted the production of bio-oil. More so, the configuration of the microwave system plays a vital role .
The ultimate goal of this technology is to convert biomass into liquid product known as bio-oil which is considered to be a promising biofuel/bioenergy carrier and can be readily stored, transported, compete with, and eventually replace non-renewable fossil fuels. More so, the liquid can also be used to produce a range of speciality and commodity chemicals . Pyrolysis offers a flexible and attractive way of converting solid biomass into an easily stored and transported liquid, which can be successfully used for the production of heat, power, and chemicals. Due to its ability to produce potentially valuable products, vigorous efforts have been made to perfect the pyrolysis process and techniques for energy recovery from waste materials, in addition to offering an alternative solution to disposal of the waste by incineration. The wide variety of pyrolysis products indicates that the products may need to be separated and purified before they can be used further; this can usually be achieved through the use of existing distillery and refinery facilities.
Different biomass constitution has consequences to the pyrolysis products which can be observed through the pyrolysis product yields and the quality of the oil. For example, the chemical structure and organic components in biomass are particularly important in the development of processes for producing derived fuels and chemicals. Numerous researchers in the literature have studied the pyrolysis of biomass on the basis of their components. In a particular study,  observed significant interactions between cellulose and lignin that caused a suppression of liquid product formation and an increase in solid residue yield.  studied the pyrolysis of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB) in a bench scale fluidized bed reactor, where a non-homogeneous liquid (bio-oil) was produced. In another attempt,  use washed OPEFB and a homogeneous liquid was produced. The bio-oil from the washed OPEFB had similar properties as wood-derived bio-oil. Pre-treatment is understood to break the internal lignin and hemicellulose bonds to increase the pore size of the biomass that can be potentially converted to useful products .
Summary of process conditions and effects
Optimal condition for fast pyrolysis
Vapor residence time
Shorter is better.
Bad for product quality and yield.
Heat transfer rate
High as possible to increase liquid yield.
Typically, <2 mm
Large particles limit heat transfer, feeding, and fluidization.
Although numerous projects have been promoted, pyrolysis commercialization is progressing at a slow pace. A better knowledge of the kinetics concerning the thermal decomposition of lignocellulosic material is required. The abundant research literature on the field of biomass pyrolysis kinetics still leaves many key issues unsolved. Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) is a technique used to determine changes in weight of a known quantity of sample in relation to a change in temperature. The data obtained from the TGA gives valuable information about the rate at which pyrolysis occurs. Derivative Thermogravimetry (DTG) is usually also applied to the TGA data, to determine the rate of weight loss as a function of temperature. The data generated from TGA include temperature, time, and weight changes during the pyrolysis process and these data can be used to calculate the activation energies and pre-exponential factor of different pyrolysis phases by means of a variety of mathematical models . TGA can be employed only at relatively low heating rates (1–50 °C/min) because the true temperature of the samples may become unknown at high heating rates. Normally, intrinsic kinetic parameters are obtained from thermogravimetric experiments performed with low heating rates and with fine particles below 1 mm, to produce a kinetically controlled regime [93, 94]. Intrinsic parameters are scale independent and do not include the effect of transport phenomena, which make them more reliable for scaling up and reactor design. With high heating rates and large particle sizes, thermal gradients are observed and the process becomes no longer kinetically controlled .
The various thermodynamic data obtained or calculated can then be used to model the pyrolysis process. Practical models that predict the evolution of specific products of interest are still expected in the literature. Numerous models exist for the pyrolysis process, each with their advantages and disadvantages. They range in complexity from simple first-order models to more mathematically complex models incorporating various factors which influence the kinetics of pyrolysis. There are various methods for evaluating kinetic parameters from TGA, and the most common of them can be classified into two major types: model-fitting and model-free [95, 96]. In the model-fitting method, different models are fit to the experimental data, and the model giving the best statistical fit is selected as the model from which the activation energy and frequency factor are evaluated. Historically, model-fitting methods were broadly used because of their ability to directly calculate the kinetic parameters from the thermogravimetric analysis results. However, these methods have several drawbacks, the most important one being their inability to uniquely select the appropriate reaction model. This led to the decline of these methods in favor of isoconversional (model-free) methods which can estimate the activation energy without evaluating the reaction model. The greatest advantages of this model are its simplicity and avoidance of errors related to selecting specific reaction models. Isoconversional method is called model-free method because of its ability to determine the activation energy for different constant extents of conversion without considering any particular form of the reaction model. According to , the isoconversional analysis based on non-isothermal data was successful in correctly describing the multistep kinetics. There is still room for improvement in developing kinetic models able to describe biomass pyrolysis for a wider range of operating conditions since the kinetic parameters obtained are often suitable only for a certain range of temperatures. Improving the mechanisms in terms of predicting the product yields and composition, suitability for a wider range of biomass and operating conditions are priorities to consider in future kinetic models.
Advantages, disadvantages, and bio-oil yield of different pyrolysis reactors; source 
Bio-oil yield (%)
Biomass size independent
High carbon conservation
Long solid residence time
Low ash carry over
Difficult to remove char
Bubbling fluidized bed
Good temperature control
Suitable for large scale
Small particle sizes are needed
Circulating fluidized bed
Good thermal control
Large particle sizes can be used
Unlikely to be suitable for large
Char is finer
Centrifugal force moves heated sand and biomass
No carrier gas required
Small particle sizes needed
Not proven yet for large scale
Produces clean oil
Can process larger particles of 3–5 cm
No carrier gas required
Lower temperature required
Easier liquid product condensation
Solid residence time is too high
Require large scale equipment
Poor heat and mass transfer rate
Generates more water
Inert gas is not required
Large particle sizes can be processed
System is more intensive
Moderate temperature required
Reactor is costly
Low reaction rate
No carrier gas required
Lower process temperature
Moving parts in hot zone
Heat transfer in large scale is not suitable
Compact and low cost
High heat transfer
Short gas residence time
Solids in the oil
Alkali dissolved in the oil
High temperature required
High energy density
High heat transfer
Very good control
High electrical power
High operating costs
Small particle sizes required
Efficient heat transfer
High heating rate
Large size biomass can be processed
Uniform temperature distribution
High operating costs
Use renewable energy
High heating rate
Conversion of energy
Transfer of energy
In-core volumetric and uniform heating at molecular level
Superficial heating via conduction, convection, and radiation
No hot spot
Higher electricity conversion efficiency
Lower electricity conversion efficiency
Dependent on material’s properties
Precise and controlled heating
Lower thermal inertia and faster response
Higher thermal inertia and slower response
Traditionally, zeolite catalyst has been employed in the oil industry for its refinement . With the improvement of technology, scientists have employed the same zeolite catalyst in the pyrolysis production process. Recently, Zeolite structure and chemical composition have been modified to improve its performance . Apart from zeolite catalysts, metal oxides have also been used in pyrolysis processes.
Biomass feedstock properties and microwave-assisted pyrolysis
Biomass feedstock property
• Smaller feedstock particle size generally improves the microwave-assisted pyrolysis process by increasing the heating rate as well as the maximal temperature .
• The relationship between feedstock particle size and the bio-oil yield is inconsistent. Generally, too small particles may lead to too high external surface area whereas too large particles may result in incomplete pyrolysis and each of these would result in a low bio-oil yield for the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass [111, 112].
• The biomass particle sizes of 2–4 mm are better for microwave-assisted pyrolysis, and these particle sizes are larger than the optimal particle sizes (0.85–2 mm) for the conventional electrical heating pyrolysis [79, 110].
• The microwave absorbability of a biomass feedstock is described by its tangent loss (tan δ). Water has a very good microwave absorbability, the moisture content in a biomass renders the feedstock a high temperature rising rate during the drying process . With increasing temperature the moisture content evaporates, the biomass feedstock becomes less microwave absorptive, and the temperature rising rate then slows down. The tangent loss value (microwave absorbability) of a biomass feedstock would be significantly varied by reaction temperatures [114, 115].
• Due to the decreases in the tangent loss value, the microwave absorbability of the biomass feedstock becomes lower and lower. This makes the pyrolysis temperature can only achieve a very low value (e.g., less than 200 °C) even if the microwave power is increased. Tangent loss materials (microwave absorbers) which can absorb microwave energy much more efficiently are used to enhance heating [116, 117].
• Ash content is another main inorganic matter in a biomass besides the abovementioned moisture content. The ash components in biomass feedstocks vary significantly from feedstock to feedstock, e.g., rice straw and wood sawdust have high contents of SiO2 (52.66–69.52%) and K2O (10.30–40.13%) while sewage sludges have low contents of SiO2 (1.62–26.40%) and K2O (0.05–1.62%) [118–121].
• Generally, some ash components are good microwave absorbers and some are not. e.g., Fe2O3 and TiO2) have higher tan δ values (0.001–0.05) whereas some ash components (e.g., MgO and SiO2) have lower tan δ values (0.0002–0.0005) .
• The ash components themselves cannot be changed to form bio-oil components, the high ash content would therefore reduce the bio-oil yields. Bio-oil yields were still very low. Studied on microwave-assisted heating of three kinds of oil shales, with high ash content showed that low bio-oil yields (0–0.24 wt.%) was obtained; which were mainly caused by the high ash contents (60.5–70.9%) .
• The major organic components in biomass feedstocks are carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids.
With conventional electrical heating, the decomposition temperature ranges are cellulose (315–390 °C), hemicellulose (250–350 °C), and lignin (200–550 °C) . However, with microwave-assisted pyrolysis, the lignocellulose components decomposed at lower temperature (around 100–150 °C lower) [115, 125]. Generally, the lignocellulosic biomass components under microwave-assisted pyrolysis would produce more bio-oil than electrical heating pyrolysis [124, 126].
• Algae biomass is rich in protein (9–30%), lipids (30–62%), and some carbohydrates (2–18%). Algae biomass is usually not a good microwave absorber, even if it has high lipid content. Among carbohydrate, protein, and lipid, the good microwave absorber is lipid . Microwave absorbers are generally required to obtain high temperatures for microwave-assisted pyrolysis of an algal biomass .
• Between microwave-assisted pyrolysis and conventional heating pyrolysis, the bio-oil yield from the microwave-assisted pyrolysis is lower [129, 130]. However, it should be noted that generally, algal biomass produce bio-oil that has much better quality by having higher H/C and H/O ratios and thereby showing higher HHVs (higher heating values) .
• Plastics and rubbers are basically polymers with high hydrocarbons. They are also widely used in microwave-assisted pyrolysis for bio-oil production. Due to the low microwave absorbability of the plastic components (e.g., polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene), the plastic cannot achieve a high temperature (lower than 180 °C) if no microwave absorber is added but can increase significantly when microwave absorber are added [132, 133].
• Compared with the plastics, rubbers are better microwave absorbers. The microwave-assisted heating of rubber can achieve a high temperature of 500 °C .
Physical properties and characteristics of pyrolysis oil––source from 
Dark red-brown to dark green
Micro-carbon and chemical composition in oil
Distinctive odor–an acid smoky smell
Lower molecular weight aldehydes and acids
Very high compared to fossil fuel
Pyrolysis bio-oil; 1.2 kg/liter
Fossil oil; 0.85 kg/liter
High moisture and heavy molecule contamination
Can vary as low as 25 cSt to as high as 1000 cSt
Wide range of feedstock, water content, and the amount of light ends collected
Significantly lower than fossil oil
High oxygen content
Viscosity increase, volatility decrease, phase separation, and deposition of gum occur with time
Complex structure and high pH value
Miscible with polar solvent but totally immiscible with petroleum fuel
Polar in nature
CO2 balance is clearly positive in biomass fuel.
Possibility of utilization in small-scale power generation systems as well as use in large power stations.
Storability and transportability of liquid fuel.
High-energy density compared to biomass gasification fuel.
Potential of using pyrolysis liquid in existing power plants.
The cost of final products depends on many factors including the feedstock availability/cost and production technology. The cost of the pyrolysis process is the main aspect associated with the processing cost. Microwave technology is a well-established method which can be applied to thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis. The microwave-assisted pyrolysis technique offers some unique advantages, like time and energy savings, which cannot be attained with other conventional heating .
Summaries of recent studies on catalytic/microwave-assisted pyrolysis
Type of material(s)
System configuration and operation conditions
Relevant results and observations
Prosopis juliflora (PJF)
The experiment was performed to examine how (i) microwave power, (ii) susceptor, (iii) particle size, and (iv) Feed:Susceptor ratio effects on the yields of bio-oil, gas, and char, composition of bio-oil. By altering 5 different industrial wastes as microwave susceptors, (i.e., graphite, char, aluminum, silicon carbide, and fly ash)
Maximum bio-oil was realized using fly ash of 40 wt % with a heating value of 26 MJ kg−1 at a microwave power of 560 W, particle size of 2–4 mm, and Feed:Susceptor ratio of 100:1. The bio-oil analysis showed mixtures of phenolic, aromatic hydrocarbons, cyclopentanones, carboxylic acids, ketones, and furan derivatives. In addition, it demonstrates that the yield and quality of bio-oil are dependent on key parameters such as microwave power, biomass particle size/composition, and type of susceptor
Experiment was carried out using a fundamentally designed scalable microwave system maximize pyrolysis oil yield and quality.
The results suggested that with controllable sample size, the liquid product yield is comparable to conventional pyrolysis and can be achieved at an energy input around 600 kWh/t. Similarly, quality of the liquid is significantly improved compared to conventional pyrolysis. This is because of the advantage the very rapid heating and quenching that can be achieved with MAP.
Corn cob, corn stover, saw dust and rice straw
The experimental materials were used without any pre-treatment and at standard microwave experimental conditions; also, MgCl2 as a catalyst
The pyrolysis of corn cob and corn cob plus catalyst gave the highest bio-oil yield up to 42.1 and 40% (wt), respectively.
Higher HHV of 22.38 MJ/kg of bio-oil from corn cob was due to the presence of ethyl ether and 2-bromo-butane with a relative proportion of 15.63 and 4.60%, respectively.
In addition, GC–MS analysis of corn cob-based bio-oil showed the presence of ethyl ether, phenol, aliphatic hydrocarbons, furfural, furan derivatives, and acids in major proportions.
Palm kernel shell
Catalytic fixed-bed and microwave pyrolysis of palm kernel shell using activated carbon (AC) and lignite char (LC) as catalysts and microwave receptors are investigated.
The authors report addition of catalyst increased the bio-oil yield, but decreased the selectivity of phenol in fixed-bed. The highest concentration of phenol in bio-oil of 64.58% (area) and total phenolics concentration of 71.24% were obtained at 500 °C using activated carbon.
Oil palm empty fruit bunch pellets
Experiment was carried out in a multimode microwave system with 2.45 GHz frequency with and without the MW absorber, activated carbon.
The ratio of feed to absorber did influence the temperature profiles of the EFB pellets and also pyrolysis products such as bio-oil, char, and gas. The highest bio-oil yield of about 21 wt.% was obtained with 25% MW absorber. The bio-oil consisted of phenolic compounds of about 60–70 area% as detected by GC-MS and confirmed by FT-IR analysis.
Chlorella sp. strain and Nannochloropsis strain
Experiment was done in the presence of a microwave absorbent SiC and catalyst HZSM-5
Results for Chlorella at temperature of 550 °C without catalyst were the optimal conditions that resulted in a maximum bio-oil yield of 57 wt%. On the other hand, optimal condition for Nannochloropsis at temperature of 500 °C with 0.5 of catalyst ratio was achieved. Resulting in a maximum bio-oil yield of 59 wt.%.
Process design––to do without susceptors
Presented a multidisciplinary design methodology for a microwave fluidized bed system that was based on processing raw biomass without the need for added microwave susceptors.
The authors found that a minimum power density of 54 MW m−3 was necessary to reach temperatures of 400 °C for particles with an average size of 600 μm at the minimum fluidization velocity (0.38 ms−1). The microwave fluidized bed system was shown to be effective in enabling pyrolysis while limiting heterogeneity and thermal runaway effects.
Corn stalk biomass briquettes
It was carried out in a developed microwave reactor supplied with 2.45 GHz frequency using 3 kW power generators.
The highest bio-oil, biochar, and gas yield of 19.6, 41.1, and 54.0% was achieved at different process condition. Quality wise, the biochar exhibited good heating value (32 MJ/kg) than bio-oil (2.47 MJ/kg).
Rice straw, rice husk, corn stover, sugarcane bagasse, sugarcane peel, waste coffee grounds, and bamboo leaves
Use empirical equation to predict the various product yields. Also applied energy return on investment.
Solid, liquid, and gas yields were in the ranges of 18–22, 40–48, and 30–40 wt%, respectively. The primary components of the gas product were H2 (18–25 vol%), CH4 (6–8 vol%), CO (51–59 vol%), and CO2 (10–14 vol%), and the rest undetermined part was only 3–5 vol%. The energy return on investment of microwave pyrolysis can be approximately 3.56, so the technique proofs can be economically feasible.
Used cooking oil
Pyrolysis was designed in order to create contact with a bed of microwave absorbents heated by microwave radiation. Different materials were used in the reaction bed, including particulate carbon, activated carbon, and mesoporous aluminosilicate.
The use of particulate and activated carbon as the reaction bed provided a fast heating rate and extensive cracking capacity to pyrolyze the used oil, thus showing favorable features that could lead to short process time and less energy usage.
Thus, it resulted in a production of a high yield of a biofuel product (up to 73 wt%) in 35 min. Additionally, the biofuel showed a composition dominated by light C5–C20 aliphatic hydrocarbons with low amounts of oxygenated compounds (≤11%). In particular, the oil product obtained from activated carbon bed showed low nitrogen content and was free of carboxylic acid and sulfur.
Malaysian oil palm shell, empty fruit bunch, rice husk, and coconut shell and wood sawdust
The dielectric properties were measured from room temperature to ~700 °C and at six different frequencies (397, 912, 1429, 1948, 2466, and 2986 MHz) using a cavity perturbation method.
The dielectric properties recorded a fallen in the drying region (24–200 °C) which is due to removal of moisture, and further, it decreased in the pyrolysis region (200–450 °C) that is due to decomposition or removal of volatile matter. Still, dielectric properties increased drastically beyond temperature 450 °C. Minimum MW absorption was attained in temperature range of 300–400 °C. Biochar which was formed after the pyrolysis process, showed high loss tangent as compared to the original biomass, signifying it as a suitable material for MW absorber and catalyst applications.
Experiment was carried out under standard microwave pyrolysis with special attention to the yields, and composition over time was studied
At the end of the pyrolysis, 43% of the solid residues, 45% of the oils, and 12% of the pyrolysis gases were obtained.
Softwood, hardwood, and herbaceous biomass
In this paper, these were processed by microwave-assisted acidolysis to produce high-quality lignin.
The lignin from the softwood was isolated largely intact in the solid residue after acidolysis. For example, a 10-min treatment, microwave-assisted acidolysis produced a lignin with a purity of 93% and yield of 82%, superior to other conventional separation methods reported in literature.
Corn stover and scum
Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis for the production of bio-oil was carried out with CaO and HZSM-5 as the catalyst. The aim of the study was to carry out investigations on the effects of reaction temperature, CaO/HZSM-5 ratio, and corn stover/scum ratio on co-pyrolysis product fractional yields and selectivity. A constant ratio of corn stover: scum: CaO: HZSM-5 = 1:1:1:1 was used in carrying the experiment.
Overall, the results showed that co-pyrolysis temperature of 550 °C gave the maximum bio-oil and aromatic yields. Mixed CaO and HZSM-5 catalyst with the weight ratio of 1:4 increased the aromatic feedstock yield to 35.77 wt.% which was 17% higher than that with HZSM-5 alone. Scum as the hydrogen donor, showed a significant synergistic effect with corn stover to promote the production of bio-oil and aromatic hydrocarbons. The maximum yield of aromatic hydrocarbons (29.3 wt.%) were obtained when the optimal corn stover to scum ratio was 1:2.
Unquestionably, Nigeria is an “Energy Heaven” as it has almost all of the renewable and non-renewable energy sources in great quantity. The task now for this country is to find ways to formulate national policies to integrate these valuable resources into generation while realizing sustainable development goals. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis can be a pathway out of poverty for developing counties. It can provide new incentives for agricultural development; offer farmers an additional source of income by providing the biomass residue for bio-oil and syngas production via pyrolysis. It will also be able to help in carbon sequestration and most importantly energy security for the country. The microwave-assisted pyrolysis is reviewed in this paper as an attempt to give strong indications on what lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis technology can offer in terms of converting waste agricultural residue, especially palm oil residue, to energy as well as helping in the reduction of overall GHG emissions for Nigeria. The overall prospect of pyrolysis technology is very optimistic because it is already a proven concept. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis appears as the most feasible of the thermo-chemical conversion techniques; capable of generating high temperatures with minimal energy. As with all new technologies, microwave pyrolysis has gained plenty of attention from researches; however, the large scale commercial plant is still not available yet. Currently, there are only few projects on continuous microwave-assisted pyrolysis which can later be scaled up into larger centralized bio-refineries. It is still difficult to precisely predict the microwave-assisted pyrolysis process and results by only judging the feedstock characteristics due to the variations in feedstock characteristics. The remedy to this dilemma has been recent investigations using pre-treatment techniques. Pre-treatment will bring about homogeneity to the feedstock which will allow the feedstock going into the pyrolysis process produce yield that are of similar chemical composition. Based on the analysis presented here and also that from other researchers, it is clear that there is still plenty that needs to be done in the future that will contribute to the efficiency of the overall process and its economic viability. The future works on microwave-assisted pyrolysis should focus on (i) the types of microwave absorbents since it is necessary to achieve desired temperatures, (ii) improving catalyst selectivity, (iii) optimizing reaction conditions to improve yield, (iv) study of the reaction kinetics and numerical simulation of the overall process, and (v) the pre-treatment of the lignocellulosic biomass to achieve homogeneity.
The authors would like to thank the University Tenaga Nasional for the research facilities. Author (Bello) also like to thank the Kaduna State Government of Nigeria for the Research Scholarship. Author (Ong MY) would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) for the My-Master scholarship.
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (FRGS2014-2) (20150203FRGS).
SN and BS conceived and designed the study. BS, RH, and MYO performed the analysis, gathered the data, and formatted the article. BS and RH wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript. SN checked, edited, and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- AfDB O, UNDP (2014) African economic outlook: global value chains and Africa’s industrialisation. OECD. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/development/african-economic-outlook-2014_aeo-2014-en#page1. Accessed Aug 2016.
- Bongaarts J (2014) United Nations, department of economic and social affairs, population division, sex differentials in childhood mortality. Popul Dev Rev 40(2):380–380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IEA (2014) Africa energy outlook: a focus on the energy prospects in sub-Saharan Africa, World Energy Outlook Special ReportGoogle Scholar
- Cervigni R, Liden R, Neumann JE, Strzepek KM (2015) Enhancing the climate resilience of Africa’s infrastructure: the power and water sectors. World Bank Publications, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Emodi NV, Yusuf SD (2015) Improving electricity access in Nigeria: obstacles and the way forward. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(1):335Google Scholar
- Sambo AS (2009) Strategic developments in renewable energy in Nigeria. Int Assoc Energy Econ 16(3):15–19Google Scholar
- Adeyemi AO (2013) Electricity consumption and economic growth in Nigeria. J Bus Manag Appl Econ 2(4):1–14Google Scholar
- BP (2015) BP Statistical review of world energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf
- Oyedepo SO (2012) Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: the way forward. Energy Sustain Soc 2(1):1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castellano A, Kendall A, Nikomarov M, Swemmer T (2015) Brighter Africa: the growth potential of the sub-Saharan electricity sector. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/energy_resources_materials/powering_africa
- Dasappa S (2011) Potential of biomass energy for electricity generation in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Sustain Dev 15(3):203–213View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oseni MO (2012) Households’ access to electricity and energy consumption pattern in Nigeria. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(1):990–995View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kooijman-van Dijk AL, Clancy J (2010) Impacts of electricity access to rural enterprises in Bolivia, Tanzania and Vietnam. Energy Sustain Dev 14(1):14–21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaaban M, Petinrin J (2014) Renewable energy potentials in Nigeria: meeting rural energy needs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:72–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharif I, Mithila M (2013) Rural electrification using PV: the success story of Bangladesh. Energy Procedia 33:343–354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007-Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S (2011) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- DeCarolis JF, Keith DW (2006) The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world. Energy Policy 34(4):395–410View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uduma K, Arciszewski T (2010) Sustainable energy development: the key to a stable Nigeria. Sustainability 2(6):1558–1570View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Connolly D, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Leahy M (2010) Modelling the existing Irish energy-system to identify future energy costs and the maximum wind penetration feasible. Energy 35(5):2164–2173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiremath R, Shikha S, Ravindranath N (2007) Decentralized energy planning; modeling and application—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(5):729–752View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talaei A, Ahadi MS, Maghsoudy S (2014) Climate friendly technology transfer in the energy sector: a case study of Iran. Energy Policy 64:349–363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J-J, Jing Y-Y, Zhang C-F, Zhao J-H (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(9):2263–2278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company.Google Scholar
- Demirtas O (2013) Evaluating the best renewable energy technology for sustainable energy planning. Int J Energy Econ Policy 3:23Google Scholar
- Theodorou S, Florides G, Tassou S (2010) The use of multiple criteria decision making methodologies for the promotion of RES through funding schemes in Cyprus, A review. Energy policy 38(12):7783–7792View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chatzimouratidis AI, Pilavachi PA (2009) Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Energy policy 37(3):778–787View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ajayi OO (2010) The potential for wind energy in Nigeria. Wind Eng 34(3):303–311MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohunakin OS (2010) Energy utilization and renewable energy sources in Nigeria. J Eng Appl Sci 5(2):171–177Google Scholar
- Okafor E, Joe-Uzuegbu C (2010) Challenges to development of renewable energy for electric power sector in Nigeria. Int J Acad Res 2(2):211-216Google Scholar
- Adaramola M, Oyewola O (2011) Wind speed distribution and characteristics in Nigeria. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 6(2):82–86Google Scholar
- Sambo A (2005) Renewable energy for rural development: the Nigerian perspective. ISESCO Sci Technol Vision 1:12–22Google Scholar
- Kurowska E, Krzysztof S (2010) Geothermal exploration in Nigeria. In: Proceedings world geothermal congressGoogle Scholar
- Simonyan K, Fasina O (2013) Biomass resources and bioenergy potentials in Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 8(40):4975–4989Google Scholar
- Saifuddin N, Bello S, Fatihah S, Vigna K (2016) Improving electricity supply in Nigeria-potential for renewable energy from biomass. Int J Appl Eng Res 11(14):8322–8339Google Scholar
- Basu P (2013) Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Academic pressGoogle Scholar
- Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Efficient Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48(8):3713-3729. doi:10.1021/ie801542g
- White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL (2011) Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrol 91(1):1–33View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aliyu AS, Dada JO, Adam IK (2015) Current status and future prospects of renewable energy in Nigeria. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:336–346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohammed Y, Mustafa MW, Bashir N, Mokhtar AS (2013) Renewable energy resources for distributed power generation in Nigeria: a review of the potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:257–268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambo AS, Garba B, Zarma IH, Gaji MM (2012) Electricity generation and the present challenges in the Nigerian power sector. J Energy Power Eng 6(7):1050Google Scholar
- Ogwueleka T (2009) Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria. J Environ Health Sci Eng 6(3):173–180Google Scholar
- Bridgwater A, Meier D, Radlein D (1999) An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org Geochem 30(12):1479–1493View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, Van Den Broek R, Berndes G, Gielen D, Turkenburg W (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenergy 25(2):119–133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravindranath N, Balachandra P, Dasappa S, Rao KU (2006) Bioenergy technologies for carbon abatement. Biomass Bioenergy 30(10):826–837View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IEA (2012) World energy outlook 2012. International Energy Agency, Paris Cedex 15, FranceView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hakala K, Kontturi M, Pahkala K (2009) Field biomass as global energy source. Agric Food Sci 18(3-4):347–365Google Scholar
- Ng FY, Yew FK, Basiron Y, Sundram K (2012) A renewable future driven with Malaysian palm oil-based green technology. J Oil Palm Environ Health 2Google Scholar
- Cervigni R, Valentini R, Santini M (2013) Toward climate-resilient development in Nigeria. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Zulkifli H, Halimah M, Chan KW, Choo YM, Mohd Basri W (2010) Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil (part 2). J Oil Palm Res, Malaysia 22:887–894Google Scholar
- Faostat F (2016) Agriculture organization of the United Nations Statistics Division (2014). Production Available in: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/S [Review date: April 2015].
- Murphy DJ (2014) The future of oil palm as a major global crop: opportunities and challenges. J Oil Palm Res 26(1):1–24Google Scholar
- Gunstone FD (2011) Supplies of vegetable oils for non‐food purposes. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 113(1):3–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feintrenie L (2014) Agro-industrial plantations in Central Africa, risks and opportunities. Biodivers Conserv 23(6):1577–1589View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gutiérrez-Vélez VH, DeFries R (2013) Annual multi-resolution detection of land cover conversion to oil palm in the Peruvian Amazon. Remote Sens Environ 129:154–167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villela AA, D'Alembert BJ, Rosa LP, Freitas MV (2014) Status and prospects of oil palm in the Brazilian Amazon. Biomass Bioenergy 67:270–278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shuit SH, Tan KT, Lee KT, Kamaruddin A (2009) Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: a Malaysian case study. Energy 34(9):1225–1235View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdullah N, Sulaiman F (2013) The oil palm wastes in Malaysia. Biomass Now-Sustain Growth Use 1(3):75–93Google Scholar
- Kurnia JC, Jangam SV, Akhtar S, Sasmito AP, Mujumdar AS (2016) Advances in biofuel production from oil palm and palm oil processing wastes: a review. Biofuel Res J 3(1):332–346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheil D, Casson A, Meijaard E, Van Noordwjik M, Gaskell J, Sunderland-Groves J, Wertz K, Kanninen M (2009) The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: what do we know and what do we need to know? vol CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 51. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
- Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673–686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks A, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dodić SN, Vasiljević TZ, Marić RM, Kosanović AJR, Dodić JM, Popov SD (2012) Possibilities of application of waste wood biomass as an energy source in Vojvodina. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2355–2360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez A, Menéndez J, Fernandez Y, Pis J, Nabais JV, Carrott P, Carrott MR (2007) Conventional and microwave induced pyrolysis of coffee hulls for the production of a hydrogen rich fuel gas. J Anal Appl Pyrol 79(1):128–135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsai W, Lee M, Chang Y (2006) Fast pyrolysis of rice straw, sugarcane bagasse and coconut shell in an induction-heating reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrol 76(1):230–237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shie J-L, Tsou F-J, Lin K-L, Chang C-Y (2010) Bioenergy and products from thermal pyrolysis of rice straw using plasma torch. Bioresour Technol 101(2):761–768View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uzun BB, Apaydin-Varol E, Ateş F, Özbay N, Pütün AE (2010) Synthetic fuel production from tea waste: characterisation of bio-oil and bio-char. Fuel 89(1):176–184View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z, Zhang B, Chen X, Bai Z, Zhang H (2008) Studies on pyrolysis of wheat straw residues from ethanol production by solid-state fermentation. J Anal Appl Pyrol 81(2):243–246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Wild P, Huijgen W, Heeres H (2012) Pyrolysis of wheat straw-derived organosolv lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrol 93:95–103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fonts I, Gea G, Azuara M, Ábrego J, Arauzo J (2012) Sewage sludge pyrolysis for liquid production: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2781–2805View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nourreddine M (2007) Recycling of auto shredder residue. J Hazard Mater 139(3):481–490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Domínguez A, Fernández Y, Fidalgo B, Pis J, Menéndez J (2008) Bio-syngas production with low concentrations of CO2 and CH4 from microwave-induced pyrolysis of wet and dried sewage sludge. Chemosphere 70(3):397–403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mettler MS, Vlachos DG, Dauenhauer PJ (2012) Top ten fundamental challenges of biomass pyrolysis for biofuels. Energy Environ Sci 5(7):7797–7809View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Onay Ö, Beis S, Koçkar ÖM (2001) Fast pyrolysis of rape seed in a well-swept fixed-bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrol 58:995–1007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Onay O, Kockar OM (2003) Slow, fast and flash pyrolysis of rapeseed. Renew Energy 28(15):2417–2433View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goyal H, Seal D, Saxena R (2008) Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(2):504–517View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jahirul MI, Rasul MG, Chowdhury AA, Ashwath N (2012) Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis—a technological review. Energies 5(12):4952–5001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borges FC, Du Z, Xie Q, Trierweiler JO, Cheng Y, Wan Y, Liu Y, Zhu R, Lin X, Chen P (2014) Fast microwave assisted pyrolysis of biomass using microwave absorbent. Bioresour Technol 156:267–274View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salema AA, Ani FN Heating characteristics of biomass and carbonaceous materials under microwave radiation. In: Clean Energy and Technology (CET), 2011 IEEE First Conference on, 2011. IEEE, pp 72-77Google Scholar
- Salema AA, Ani FN (2011) Microwave induced pyrolysis of oil palm biomass. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3388–3395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halim SA, Swithenbank J (2016) Characterisation of Malaysian wood pellets and rubberwood using slow pyrolysis and microwave technology. J Anal Appl Pyrol 122:64–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF, Michailof CM, Pilavachi PA, Lappas AA (2014) A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrol 105:143–150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Worasuwannarak N, Sonobe T, Tanthapanichakoon W (2007) Pyrolysis behaviors of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by TG-MS technique. J Anal Appl Pyrol 78(2):265–271View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdullah N, Bridgwater A (2006) Pyrolysis liquid derived from oil palm empty fruit bunches. J Phys Sci 17(2):117–129Google Scholar
- Abdullah N, Gerhauser H (2008) Bio-oil derived from empty fruit bunches. Fuel 87(12):2606–2613View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan L, Yu Y, Li X, Zhao J, Qu Y, Choo YM, Loh SK (2013) Pretreatment of empty fruit bunch from oil palm for fuel ethanol production and proposed biorefinery process. Bioresour Technol 135:275–282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridgwater A, Toft A, Brammer J (2002) A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 6(3):181–246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van de Velden M, Baeyens J, Brems A, Janssens B, Dewil R (2010) Fundamentals, kinetics and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction. Renewable energy 35(1):232–242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Zheng C, Lee DH, Liang DT (2006) In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuels 20(1):388–393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridgwater A, Hofbauer H, Van Loo S (2009) Thermal biomass conversion. CPL PressGoogle Scholar
- Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review. Energy & Fuels 20 (3):848-889. doi:10.1021/ef0502397
- Blondeau J, Jeanmart H (2012) Biomass pyrolysis at high temperatures: prediction of gaseous species yields from an anisotropic particle. Biomass Bioenergy 41:107–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burnham AK, Zhou X, Broadbelt LJ (2015) Critical review of the global chemical kinetics of cellulose thermal decomposition. Energy Fuels 29(5):2906–2918View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang G, Nowakowski DJ, Bridgwater AV (2010) A systematic study of the kinetics of lignin pyrolysis. Thermochimica Acta 498(1):61–66View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sbirrazzuoli N, Vincent L, Mija A, Guigo N (2009) Integral, differential and advanced isoconversional methods: complex mechanisms and isothermal predicted conversion–time curves. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 96(2):219–226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Budrugeac P (2002) Differential non-linear isoconversional procedure for evaluating the activation energy of non-isothermal reactions. J Therm Anal Calorim 68(1):131–139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papari S, Hawboldt K (2015) A review on the pyrolysis of woody biomass to bio-oil: focus on kinetic models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1580–1595View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen P, Xie Q, Addy M, Zhou W, Liu Y, Wang Y, Cheng Y, Li K, Ruan R (2016) Utilization of municipal solid and liquid wastes for bioenergy and bioproducts production. Bioresour Technol 215:163–172View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duan P, Savage PE (2011) Upgrading of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water. Bioresour Technol 102(2):1899–1906View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peterson AA, Vogel F, Lachance RP, Fröling M, Antal MJ Jr, Tester JW (2008) Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub-and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ Sci 1(1):32–65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gunawan R, Li X, Lievens C, Gholizadeh M, Chaiwat W, Hu X, Mourant D, Bromly J, Li C-Z (2013) Upgrading of bio-oil into advanced biofuels and chemicals. Part I. Transformation of GC-detectable light species during the hydrotreatment of bio-oil using Pd/C catalyst. Fuel 111:709–717View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Zhang Q, Wang T, Li B, Xu Y, Ma L (2016) Efficient upgrading process for production of low quality fuel from bio-oil. Fuel 179:312–321View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Lei H, Ren S, Bu Q, Liang J, Wei Y, Liu Y, Lee G-SJ, Chen S, Tang J (2012) Aromatics and phenols from catalytic pyrolysis of Douglas fir pellets in microwave with ZSM-5 as a catalyst. J Anal Appl Pyrol 98:194–200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang B, Zhong Z, Chen P, Ruan R (2015) Microwave-assisted catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass for bio-oil production using chemical vapor deposition modified HZSM-5 catalyst. Bioresour Technol 197:79–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcilla A, Catalá L, García-Quesada JC, Valdés F, Hernández M (2013) A review of thermochemical conversion of microalgae. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27:11–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Q, Chang J, Wang T, Xu Y (2007) Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Convers Manag 48(1):87–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Motasemi F, Afzal MT (2013) A review on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis technique. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:317–330View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- NESP (2015) The Nigerian energy sector––an overview with a special emphasis on renewable energy, energy efficiency and rural electrification., https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2015-en-nigerian-energy-sector.pdf Google Scholar
- Suriapparao DV, Pradeep N, Vinu R (2015) Bio-oil production from Prosopis juliflora via microwave pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 29(4):2571–2581View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shang H, Lu R-R, Shang L, Zhang W-H (2015) Effect of additives on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of sawdust. Fuel Process Technol 131:167–174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1126–1140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Omar R, Idris A, Yunus R, Khalid K, Isma MA (2011) Characterization of empty fruit bunch for microwave-assisted pyrolysis. Fuel 90(4):1536–1544View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Motasemi F, Ani FN (2012) A review on microwave-assisted production of biodiesel. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(7):4719–4733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Budarin VL, Shuttleworth PS, Farmer TJ, Gronnow MJ, Pfaltzgraff L, Macquarrie DJ, Clark JH (2015) The potential of microwave technology for the recovery, synthesis and manufacturing of chemicals from bio-wastes. Catalysis Today 239:80–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mamaeva A, Tahmasebi A, Tian L, Yu J (2016) Microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for production of phenolic-rich bio-oil. Bioresour Technol 211:382–389View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed BA, Kim CS, Ellis N, Bi X (2016) Microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of switchgrass for improving bio-oil and biochar properties. Bioresour Technol 201:121–132View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu H, Ma X, Li L, Hu Z, Guo P, Jiang Y (2014) The catalytic pyrolysis of food waste by microwave heating. Bioresour Technol 166:45–50View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Ma X, Xu Q, Hu Z (2013) Influence of microwave power, metal oxides and metal salts on the pyrolysis of algae. Bioresour Technol 142:469–474View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu Y, Yu J, Sun B, Yan Z (2014) Influence of catalyst types on the microwave-induced pyrolysis of sewage sludge. J Anal Appl Pyrol 106:86–91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Budarin VL, Clark JH, Lanigan BA, Shuttleworth P, Breeden SW, Wilson AJ, Macquarrie DJ, Milkowski K, Jones J, Bridgeman T (2009) The preparation of high-grade bio-oils through the controlled, low temperature microwave activation of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 100(23):6064–6068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hascakir B, Akin S (2009) Recovery of Turkish oil shales by electromagnetic heating and determination of the dielectric properties of oil shales by an analytical method. Energy Fuels 24(1):503–509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Du Z, Hu B, Ma X, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Lin X, Wan Y, Lei H, Chen P, Ruan R (2013) Catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae and their three major components: carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. Bioresour Technol 130:777–782View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farag S, Fu D, Jessop PG, Chaouki J (2014) Detailed compositional analysis and structural investigation of a bio-oil from microwave pyrolysis of kraft lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrol 109:249–257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mašek O, Budarin V, Gronnow M, Crombie K, Brownsort P, Fitzpatrick E, Hurst P (2013) Microwave and slow pyrolysis biochar—comparison of physical and functional properties. J Anal Appl Pyrol 100:41–48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suriapparao DV, Vinu R (2015) Bio-oil production via catalytic microwave pyrolysis of model municipal solid waste component mixtures. RSC Advances 5(71):57619–57631View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patil P, Reddy H, Muppaneni T, Ponnusamy S, Sun Y, Dailey P, Cooke P, Patil U, Deng S (2013) Optimization of microwave-enhanced methanolysis of algal biomass to biodiesel under temperature controlled conditions. Bioresour Technol 137:278–285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang N, Tahmasebi A, Yu J, Xu J, Huang F, Mamaeva A (2015) A comparative study of microwave-induced pyrolysis of lignocellulosic and algal biomass. Bioresour Technol 190:89–96View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beneroso D, Bermúdez J, Arenillas A, Menéndez J (2013) Microwave pyrolysis of microalgae for high syngas production. Bioresour Technol 144:240–246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bermúdez JM, Francavilla M, Calvo EG, Arenillas A, Franchi M, Menéndez JA, Luque R (2014) Microwave-induced low temperature pyrolysis of macroalgae for unprecedented hydrogen-enriched syngas production. RSC Advances 4(72):38144–38151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferrera-Lorenzo N, Fuente E, Bermúdez J, Suárez-Ruiz I, Ruiz B (2014) Conventional and microwave pyrolysis of a macroalgae waste from the Agar–Agar industry. Prospects for bio-fuel production. Bioresour Technol 151:199–206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Undri A, Rosi L, Frediani M, Frediani P (2014) Microwave assisted pyrolysis of corn derived plastic bags. J Anal Appl Pyrol 108:86–97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartoli M, Rosi L, Frediani M, Undri A, Frediani P (2015) Depolymerization of polystyrene at reduced pressure through a microwave assisted pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 113:281–287View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang ALC, Ani FN (2016) Controlled microwave-induced pyrolysis of waste rubber tires. Int J Technol 7(2):314–322View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson J, Dodds C, Stavrinides A, Kingman S, Katrib J, Wu Z, Medrano J, Overend R (2015) Microwave pyrolysis of biomass: control of process parameters for high pyrolysis oil yields and enhanced oil quality. Energy Fuels 29(3):1701–1709View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravikumar C, Kumar PS, Subhashni S, Tejaswini P, Varshini V (2017) Microwave assisted fast pyrolysis of corn cob, corn stover, saw dust and rice straw: experimental investigation on bio-oil yield and high heating values. Sustain Mater Technol 11:19–27Google Scholar
- Omoriyekomwan JE, Tahmasebi A, Yu J (2016) Production of phenol-rich bio-oil during catalytic fixed-bed and microwave pyrolysis of palm kernel shell. Bioresour Technol 207:188–196View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salema AA, Ani FN (2012) Pyrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch biomass pellets using multimode microwave irradiation. Bioresour Technol 125:102–107View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borges FC, Xie Q, Min M, Muniz LAR, Farenzena M, Trierweiler JO, Chen P, Ruan R (2014) Fast microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae using microwave absorbent and HZSM-5 catalyst. Bioresour Technol 166:518–526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adam M, Beneroso D, Katrib J, Kingman S, Robinson JP (2017) Microwave fluidized bed for biomass pyrolysis. Part I: Process design. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref 11:601–612. doi:10.1002/bbb.1780
- Salema AA, Afzal MT, Bennamoun L (2017) Pyrolysis of corn stalk biomass briquettes in a scaled-up microwave technology. Bioresour Technol 233:353–362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lo S-L, Huang Y-F, Chiueh P-T, Kuan W-H (2017) Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Procedia 105:41–46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lam SS, Mahari WAW, Jusoh A, Chong CT, Lee CL, Chase HA (2017) Pyrolysis using microwave absorbents as reaction bed: an improved approach to transform used frying oil into biofuel product with desirable properties. J Clean Prod 147:263–272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salema AA, Ani FN, Mouris J, Hutcheon R (2017) Microwave dielectric properties of Malaysian palm oil and agricultural industrial biomass and biochar during pyrolysis process. Fuel Process Technol 166:164–173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Sun J, Wang W, Mao Y, Ma C (2017) Microwave pyrolysis of tire powders: evolution of yields and composition of products. J Anal Appl Pyrol 123:152–159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou L, Santomauro F, Fan J, Macquarrie D, Clark J, Chuck CJ, Budarin V (2017) Fast microwave-assisted acidolysis: a new biorefinery approach for the zero-waste utilisation of lignocellulosic biomass to produce high quality lignin and fermentable saccharides. Faraday Discussions. doi:10.1039/C7FD00102A
- Liu S, Xie Q, Zhang B, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Chen P, Ruan R (2016) Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of corn stover and scum for bio-oil production with CaO and HZSM-5 as the catalyst. Bioresour Technol 204:164–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar