Energy savings by adopting precision agriculture in rural USA
© Bora et al.; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 31 August 2012
Accepted: 6 November 2012
Published: 21 November 2012
Energy input in agriculture has increased tremendously and accounts for about 17% of total energy consumed in the USA. Precision agriculture involves knowledge-based technical management systems to optimize application of fertilizer, chemicals, seeds, and irrigation resources to reduce input costs and to enhance crop yield while simultaneously reducing harmful environmental impacts associated with inefficient use of agricultural inputs. It also uses GPS-based auto-guidance systems in agricultural vehicles to reduce overlapping of equipment and tractor passes, thus saving fuel, labor, time, and soil compaction with environmental benefit.
This study was undertaken to quantify the fuel and labor savings resulting from adoption of precision agricultural technology in the upper mid-west state of North Dakota in the USA. A survey was conducted with responses from farmers of various demographics about savings of time and fuel in their agricultural vehicle by the use of GPS guidance and autosteering systems.
It was found that 34% farms used GPS guidance systems, reducing machine time and fuel consumption by 6.04% and 6.32%, respectively. Twenty-seven percent of the farms used autosteering systems, which further reduced machine time by 5.75% and fuel consumption by 5.33%. GPS guidance and autosteering systems can save an average of 1,647 and 1,866 L of fuel per farm respectively. The monetized values of time saved for the average farm are US$733.85 and US$851.27 for GPS guidance and autosteering systems, respectively.
The farm energy savings in terms of fuel and time by using GPS guidance and/or autosteering systems in farm vehicles in the Upper-Midwest region of the USA was estimated from the survey results. Based on the perceptions of farmers adopting precision agriculture, the two technologies investigated in this research provided a positive return on investment and would be beneficial to North Dakota’s agricultural sector if adopted more widely.
KeywordsEnergy savings GPS guidance systems Autosteer Precision agriculture
Precision agriculture involves the development and adoption of knowledge-based technical management systems with the goal of optimizing application of fertilizer, chemicals, seeds, and irrigation resources to reduce input costs and maximize production. Precision agricultural technology has the ability to spatially vary the rates of all inputs to tailor to the varied production potential within the field, which can be gauged by use of geo-referenced historical crop yield data. Variable rate technology (VRT) can be used in both conventional and conservation tillage systems. Adoption of VRT technologies can reduce fuel use, since VRT coupled with GPS guidance systems reduces implement overlap during input applications, thus saving labor and machine hours .
The US agricultural energy use has increased tremendously in the last 50 years and accounts for approximately 17% of total national energy use. Approximately 400 gal of oil equivalent is used annually to produce the food that feeds each American; 19% of this is used to operate field machinery . Precision technologies such as auto guidance reduce overlapping of passes while planting seeds or applying chemicals and fertilizers, which results in less fuel usage and labor time. The decreased application of chemicals and fertilizer also results in reduction of energy consumption by the agricultural machinery and reduced expenditure on inputs.
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimates that even if only 10% of the US farmers use a guidance system for planting seeds in the USA, 16 million gallons of fuel, four million pounds of insecticide, and two million quarts of herbicide can be saved annually . This will not only result in energy savings, but also financial savings for producers. A study by Clemson University showed that spatially varied tillage depth reduced energy requirements by 56% and fuel consumption by 34%. They also found that there is a potential energy savings of up to 52% by using variable rate irrigation systems .
Little research has been done relative to energy saving through precision agriculture, but USDA-NRCS has estimated the savings. A recent study by USDA notes that overlaps can be reduced from 24 to 2 in. by using a guidance system, which saves about US$13,000 in variable costs annually for a farm of 1,000 acres . Based on these estimates, a GPS guidance system provides a substantial return on investment and pays for itself within one year. The return on investment increases with the size of the farm as the annual savings increase and the equipment cost is spread over more acreage. Provision of free GPS signals by the federal government has encouraged producers to use new precision tools, techniques, and services to enhance their efforts to save energy and reduce costs .
Different tillage systems can also play an important role in reducing fossil fuel use in farming operations. By practicing no-till farming, a farmer can save 3.9 gal/ac, or US$13.65/ac, assuming diesel fuel costs of US$3.50/gal . Shibusawa  noted that the energy input–output ratio for crop production is very high, especially in fruits and vegetables. The machinery fuels and agro-chemicals derived from fossil fuels (including fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides) are the major sources of high energy inputs in crop production systems.
This research has two major objectives: (1) to estimate the rate of adoption for GPS guidance and autosteering systems among agricultural producers of the Upper Midwest region of the USA and (2) to estimate the energy savings attributable to the adoption of these two precision agriculture technologies in crop production in the Upper Midwest region.
Farm statistics of North Dakota in 2007
Number of farms
Land in farms
16,055,735 ha (39,674,586 ac)
Average size of farm
502 ha (1,241 ac)
Machinery and equipment value
US$174,683 per farm
Land and buildings value
US$957,053 per farm
GPS guidance and autosteering systems
GPS guidance and autosteering systems are used in agricultural equipment to increase operational efficiency and effective field capacity, resulting in more area covered per unit of time. The GPS guidance systems are used for parallel field operation with predetermined swath width across the field. It consists of GPS receiver, antenna, controller, and the display of choice, including either a light bar or a monitor. It can also have additional features such as a data logger, sound device, or visual display . The GPS receiver can have differential corrections such as the Wide Area Augmentation Systems, the National GPS Differential Correction Service (beacon) or real-time kinematic differential correction, depending upon the required accuracy.
Autosteering systems in agricultural vehicles use the GPS guidance systems with the added option of automatically steering the vehicle. In this case, the mechanical device or an integrated electro-hydraulic control system installed in the cab automatically steers the vehicle based on the GPS signal and predetermined swath width. When using autosteer, the equipment operator only steers during turns and other maneuvers .
Though many farmers have been using these technologies for some time, having adopted them based on peer recommendations and anecdotal evidence of the reduced need for costly inputs, the actual benefits in terms of energy and time savings need to be quantified. This study estimated the savings of time and energy attributable to GPS guidance and autosteering systems in North Dakota to develop a precision technology program for the farmers.
Research methods and data
The collected data were used to estimate the percentage of farm operators who have adopted GPS guidance systems and autosteer technology in their operations. We also used a logistic regression model  to determine how farm size and number of farm workers affect a farm operator’s likelihood of using autosteer and/or GPS guidance. Lastly, we report the average producer’s perception of the amounts of time and fuel saved by using these technologies in tillage, planting, spraying, harvesting, and other activities.
Results and discussion
Logistic regression results relating precision agriculture use to farm size and number of farm workers
Effect of farm size
Effect of number of farm workers
Average savings through GPS guidance systems
Time saved (hours)
Time saved (%)
Fuel saved (gallons)
Fuel saved (%)
Average savings through autosteering systems
Time saved (hours)
Time saved (%)
Fuel saved (gallons)
Fuel saved (%)
The study was undertaken to estimate the farm energy savings in terms of fuel and time by using GPS guidance and/or autosteering systems in farm vehicles in the Upper-Midwest region of the USA. A survey was conducted in the state of North Dakota, and the results indicated that there is a good adoption of precision agricultural technology in the region. Thirty-four percent of the respondents used GPS guidance systems, resulting in savings of 6% of time and 6.32% of fuel. The results also showed that 27% of farms used autosteering systems and saved 5.75% of time and 5.33% fuel. Almost 1,870 l (500 gal) of fuel is saved using autosteering systems, and this is equivalent to savings of approximately US$1,500 per farm. Based on the perceptions of farmers who have adopted precision agriculture technology in the state of North Dakota, the two technologies investigated in this research provide a positive return on investment and would be beneficial to North Dakota’s agricultural sector if adopted more widely.
- USDA-NRCS: Conservation practices that save: precision agriculture. 2006. Available at http://www.usada.gov Accessed 14 Jul 2012Google Scholar
- Pfeiffer DA: Eating fossil fuels. From The Wilderness Publications, Sherman Oaks; 2004.Google Scholar
- Khalilian A: Precision agriculture research. Clemson Public Service. University of Clemson; 2009. Accessed 13 Jul 2011 http://www.clemson.edu/public/rec/edisto/research/precision_ag.html Accessed 13 Jul 2011Google Scholar
- USDA-NRCS: Conservation Resource Brief: Energy Management. Number 0608. U. S. Department of Agriculture; 2006. Available:. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/feature/outlook/Energy.pdf Accessed 26 Oct 2012Google Scholar
- Shibusawa S (2003) Development of plant production system using mirror duct (Part I) - a strategy for conjunction of plant factory and precision agriculture in small scale farming. Paper no. 034072 presented at: ASAE Annual Meeting held at Las Vegas, Nevada, July 27–30, 2003. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI; 2003.Google Scholar
- NDDES: North Dakota Department of Emergency Services: severe winter weather. 2012. Available at. www.nd.gov/des/get/severe-winter-weather/ Accessed 26 Oct 2012Google Scholar
- USDA-NASS: Census of agriculture: North Dakota State and County Data, 2007. 2009. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Census_by_State/North_Dakota. Accessed 10 Oct 2012Google Scholar
- Sullivan M, Ehsani MR: GPS guidance systems - an overview of the components and options. Ohio State University Extension Factsheet. AEX-570–02, Columbus, Ohio; 2002. Available at http://ohioline.osu.edu/aex-fact/0570.html Accessed 13 Jul 2011Google Scholar
- Adamchuk VI: Satellite-based auto-guidance. University of Nebraska at Lincoln Extension Circular, EC706, Lincoln, Nebraska; 2008. Available at http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/epublic/live/ec706/build/ec706.pdf Accessed 13 Jul 2011Google Scholar
- Greene WH: Econometric Analysis. 5th edition. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall; 2002.Google Scholar
- Hudson D, Seah L, Hite D, Haab T: Telephone presurveys, self-selection, and non-response bias to mail and Internet surveys in economic research. Appl Econ Lett 2004, 11: 237–240. 10.1080/13504850410001674876View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- USDA-NASS: Farm labor report ISSN: 1949–0909. 2011. Available at http://http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/nass/FarmLabo//2010s/2011/FarmLabo-02–17–2011.pdf Accessed 26 Oct 2012Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.