- Short communication
- Open Access
Optimisation of the use of biomass for energy production (Optimierung der energetischen Biomassenutzung)-a funding programme introduces itself
© Thrän et al; licensee Springer. 2011
Received: 28 October 2011
Accepted: 9 December 2011
Published: 9 December 2011
In 2009 the German funding programme for "Promoting Projects to Optimise the Use of Biomass for Energy Production" ("Biomass for Energy") has started and fostered a wide range of projects to combine sustainable energy supply and climatic protection. Certain projects are described to give an idea of the wide range of projects and the different aspects of sustainability which are addressed. Additionally a first product for the planned quality assurance of the results via a dedicated method handbook is given.
The sustainable use of biomass has the potential to be of huge benefit in terms of climate and resource protection, security of energy supply and the development of rural areas.
The discussed disadvantages of the use of biomass for energy production such as food insecurity, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and biodiversity loss from land use, change or overuse of water and soil are taken into consideration in all new research projects. The biomass resources are limited, and must therefore be used effectively and in an energy-saving way.
For this reason, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) has drawn up a programme for "Promoting Projects to Optimise the Use of Biomass for Energy Production" ("Biomass for Energy") in the framework of the German Climate Initiative. The subject of the funding programme is the research and development of energy efficient technologies and the optimisation of processes and procedures in the field of power, heat and fuels from biomass. The results of these research processes are used for the development of a sustainable and manageable biomass strategy. Therefore the funding programme is supported by a service and support team, in which DT, DP and AG organise networking, method discussion and harmonisation, as well as quality assurance and dissemination of results.
2. The projects
Since the programme was launched in April 2009, several research projects, partially grouped in joint research projects, are focusing on the design and examination of improved biomass utilisation technologies. Projects for the use of residues, for the drawing up of regionally integrated and optimised local concepts (biomass incineration) as well as the development and presentation of biomass gasification technologies, have particular significance. Questions concerning knowledge, education and consultation and the social acceptability of biomass are also part of the programme. First of all, the practical work of the first 36 projects includes the creation of a reliable data base, optimisation approaches, concepts, biomass potential (by-products, waste, landscape management residues, agriculture and forestry) and feasibility studies. In addition, further 17 projects are funded in a second phase of the programme starting at the end of 2010. In this case, pilot and demonstration projects are at the centre of interest. The period of the funding programme is from 2009 to 2014.
Biomass-to-Gas: The Energetic Utilisation of Biomass Residues by Means of an Absorption Enhanced Reforming Technology (03KB011).
Information on Sustainable Use of Agricultural Residues for the Provision of Bioenergy (03KB021).
The Optimisation of Regional Cycles for the Supply of Biogenic Fuels for Power Plants, quoting the example of the Biomassehof Achental (03KB053).
3. R & D Platform "BtG" Biomass-to-Gas: The Energetic Utilisation of Biomass Residues by Means of an Absorption Enhanced Reforming Technology
(FuE-Plattform "BtG"--Energetische Nutzung biogener Reststoffe mit AER-Technologie) (03KB011)
The research activities in the field of polygeneration (integrated generation of three or more outputs such as heat, power and fuel are represented among others by the Research and Development Platform "Biomass-to-Gas: The Energetic Utilisation of Biomass Residues by Means of an Absorption Enhanced Reforming (AER) Technology" (03KB011).
The AER process which is investigated by the Centre for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research of Baden-Württemberg produces a synthesis gas allowing for the polygeneration of power, heat, SNG (Renewable "Substitute Natural Gas") and Renewable Hydrogen . The main advantage of the AER process is a high quality product, i.e. a gas with an increased H2 content and a reduced content of CO, CO2, and tars . In order to continually generate an H2-rich product gas, two fluidised-bed reactors are combined and a CO2-sorptive bed material (natural limestone) is circulated between them. The bed material transports heat into the allothermal gasification unit where it separates additional CO2 at temperatures less than 800°C. Residual biomass char is burnt in the second reactor in order to heat and regenerate the bed material (releasing CO2) at temperatures higher than 800°C. Due to the high H2 content and the adjusted composition of the product gas, the generation of SNG can be realised without CO2 separation in a single methanation step .
the characterisation and checking of the suitability of new biomass sources (e.g. residual biomass from landscape conservation) as alternatives for wood (in cooperation with Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology of Stuttgart University),
the development of a hot gas cleaning concept for the generation of SNG (in cooperation with the DVGW research division of the Engler-Bunte-Institute of Karlsruhe University),
the basic engineering of the generation of renewable hydrogen via pressure swing adsorption,
the influence of pressure on CO2 absorption as well as on biomass conversion (Figure 2).
4. Information on Sustainable Use of Agricultural Residues for the Provision of Bioenergy The Sustainable Use of Agricultural Residues for the Production of Bioenergy
(Basisinformationen für eine nachhaltige Nutzung von landwirtschaftlichen Reststoffen zur Bioenergieerzeugung) (03KB021)
5. The Optimisation of Regional Cycles for the Supply of Biogenic Fuels for Power Plants, quoting the example of the Biomassehof Achental
(Optimierung regionaler Kreisläufe zur Bereitstellung biogener Brennstoffe für Energieerzeugungsanlagen am Beispiel Biomassehof Achental) (03KB053)
6. Comparable methods
For optimisation, benchmarks are needed in order to be able to measure it. This is especially true for research in regards to the use of biomass for energy production, as a variety of potential uses opens up many possible utilisation pathways. When they began their work in 2009, scientists from the "Biomass for Energy" funding programme were faced with the task of harmonising their combined methodological processes in order to make performance characteristics as well as cost calculations and accounting comparable. DT coordinated an intensive discussion process and the production of the "Methods Handbook - Part 1: Technological parameters, supplying costs, life cycle assessment" (Methodenhandbuch), which is intended for the use in the material flow-orientated assessment of research within the scope of the funding programme and the entire bioenergy sector.
In the past, a comparison of the data and results in the field of bioenergy research proved to be difficult, as no uniform standards and methods had been agreed upon by the scientific community. The need to harmonise the methods seemed therefore all the more urgent, since the individual projects in the "Biomass for Energy" funding programme were supposed to be evaluated according to the climate protection effects achieved. For example, these evaluations are undertaken on the basis of the biomass potential, the energy and material balance of conversion processes, economic efficiency calculations plus GHG reductions and other environmental effects.
In the "Methods Handbook", the GHG calculation of the entire process chain is carried out in accordance with the EU Renewable Energy Directive (EU RED 2009/28/EG), partially modified using Germany-specific comparators. The efficiency of test plants is compared--over a specific time frame--with plants that have already proven themselves and have been introduced into the market. In the case of new technological developments, a scenario-based view of the years 2020 to 2050 is also provided assuming that there will be a successful introduction of the system.
For instance, the raw material basis is assessed by means of a potential analysis or a description of the specific reference used. The energy contents of the biomass and the (bio-) energy sources are represented as calorific values in joules.
With the "Methods Handbook" the first step in developing an open standardisation process has been taken. For the first draft, 11 authors involved in the funding programme contributed their experience. The final version of the handbook is currently tested and will be published in 2012.
A German version of the "Methods Handbook--Part 1: Technological parameters, supplying costs, and life cycle assessment" is freely available for download: http://www.energetische-biomassenutzung.de/de/downloads/programminformationen.html.
Biomass = Material of biological origin excluding material embedded in geological formations and/or transformed to fossils. (1) Herbaceous biomass: Biomass from plants that have a non-woody stems which are dying at the end of the growing season. (2) Fruit biomass: Biomass from parts of a plant which hold seeds. (3) Woody biomass: Biomass from trees, bushes and shrubs .
- Pfeifer C, Puchner B, Hofbauer H: In situ CO 2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier to produce a hydrogen rich syngas. Int J Chem Reactor Eng 2007, 5: A9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Rauch R, Hofbauer H, Marquard-Moellenstedt T, Specht M: H 2 rich product gas by steam gasification of biomass with in situ CO 2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 8 MW fuel input. Fuel Process Technol 2009, 90: 914–921. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.03.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brellochs J, Marquard-Moellenstedt T, Zuberbuehler U, Specht M, Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H: Stoichiometry adjustment of biomass steam gasification in DFB process by in situ CO 2 absorption. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Polygeneration Strategies. Vienna; 2009.Google Scholar
- Leithold G, Hülsbergen KJ, Michel D, Schönmeier H: Humusbilanzierung--Methoden und Anwendung als Agrar-Umweltindikator. In Umweltverträgliche Pflanzenproduktion--Indikatoren, Bilanzierungsansätze und ihre Einbindung in Ökobilanzen. Zeller Verlag, Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt. Osnabrück; 1997:43–55.Google Scholar
- Hülsbergen KJ: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Bilanzierungsmodells zur Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit landwirtschaftlicher Systeme. Shaker Verlag, Aachen 2003.Google Scholar
- Weiser C, Vetter A, Reinicke F, Wagner B: Ehrlich währt am längsten--Bestimmung des deutschlandweiten Getreidestrohpotenzials auf Landkreisebene unter Anwendung verschiedener Humusbilanzmethoden. Bauernzeitung 2011,19(Woche):26–28.Google Scholar
- Weiser C, Zeller V, Thrän D, Vetter A: Distribution of sustainable straw potentials in Germany. In Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition--From Research to Market Deployment. ETA Florence; 2011.Google Scholar
- Zeller V, Weiser C, Hennenberg K, Reinicke F, Schaubach K, Thrän D, Vetter A, Wagner B: Basisinformationen für eine nachhaltige Nutzung landwirtschaftlicher Reststoffe zur Bioenergiebereitstellung. Schriftenreihe des BMU-Förderprogramms „Energetische Biomassenutzung" - Band 2. 2011. DBFZ LeipzigGoogle Scholar
- Solid biofuels-terminology, definitions and descriptions. Final draft of the norm 14588 European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), Brussels; 2010.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.