Open Access

The production of renewable energy in the form of methane using electrolytic hydrogen generation

  • Koji Hashimoto1Email author,
  • Naokazu Kumagai2,
  • Koichi Izumiya2,
  • Hiroyuki Takano2 and
  • Zenta Kato1
Energy, Sustainability and Society20144:17

DOI: 10.1186/s13705-014-0017-5

Received: 4 March 2014

Accepted: 8 July 2014

Published: 12 August 2014


An extrapolation of the world energy consumption from 1990 to 2010 indicates a complete exhaustion of the world reserves of oil, natural gas, uranium, and coal by 2043, 2047, 2051, and 2055, respectively. For the survival of all people in the whole world, intermittent and fluctuating electricity generated from renewable energy should be supplied in the form of usable fuel. We have been working on research and development of global CO2 recycling for the use of renewable energy produced via electrolytic hydrogen generation in the form of methane. We created energy-saving cathodes for H2 production, anodes for O2 evolution without chlorine formation in seawater electrolysis, and catalysts for methanation of CO2 by the reaction with H2, and built pilot plants on an industrial scale. The development of new anode and cathode for alkali water electrolysis, the improvement of the anode for seawater electrolysis and the catalysts for CO2 methanation, as well as industrial applications are in progress.



The future of energy

Over the past two decades, we have been working on research and development of a global CO2 recycling system. Now, industrial applications of global CO2 recycling are in progress. At first, let us identify problems regarding global energy in the current situation of unlimited access to energy resources, including oil, natural gas, coal, and uranium. The US Department of Energy (DOE) has collected energy-related world data over a period of 30 years (from 1980 to 2010) [1]. Based on these DOE data, Figure 1 exhibits the chronological patterns of variation in energy consumption per capita in three groups of countries as well as those of the world, USA, Japan, and China. A significant difference in the energy consumption per capita among the countries is evident. As shown in Figure 2, the CO2 emissions per capita are almost the same as the energy consumption per capita. There is no trend of decreasing energy consumption and carbon emissions per capita in developed countries except for temporary fluctuations influenced by the economic situation, for which Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008 is a recent example. The energy consumption and carbon emission per capita of developing countries are far lower than those of developed countries. Figure 3 illustrates the relationship between the energy consumption per capita and population for three groups of countries in 2010. The population of developed countries was 17.7% of the world population consuming nearly half of the world's energy. The residents in developing countries reached 78.1% of the world population but consumed less than half of the world's energy consumption. The residents in developing countries can therefore double the current level of energy consumption per capita to approach the global average level of energy consumption. In contrast, a 77% reduction of energy consumption per capita for US residents is required to reach an average global energy consumption level. Such a target is practically impossible to achieve. It is also impossible to reduce the energy consumption per capita by 60% on average for all developed countries and a half for Eurasian countries. Thus, the energy consumption per capita in the world will increase continuously. Moreover, the world population rose from 1980 to 2010 with an annual increase of 80 million [1]. Consequently, it is inevitable that the total world energy consumption would rise continuously.
Figure 1

Change in energy consumption per capita for the world, three groups of countries, USA, China and Japan [[1]].
Figure 2

Change in CO 2 emissions per capita for the world, three groups of countries, USA, China and Japan [[1]].
Figure 3

Relationship between energy consumption per capita and population in the three groups of countries in 2010 [[1]]. Although the values of developed and developing countries include those of USA and China, respectively, the values of USA and China are separately overwritten.

The left side of Figure 4 shows the chronological patterns of global energy consumption for the recent 30 years [1]. The annual global energy consumption increased steadily by a factor of 1.0196 from 1990 to 2010 after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The full line prediction curve in Figure 4 was drawn by extrapolating the recent energy consumption record under the assumption of the annual rising factor of 1.0196. In Figure 4, the projected year of exhaustion is given based on the energy consumption mode of 2010 as 2043 for oil and 2047 for natural gas. If the usage of uranium as a fuel for nuclear power reactors in any country will be allowed without any limitation, the estimated uranium resource of 5.33 Mt [2] will be exhausted in 2051. Then, in 2055, coal would be exhausted. A continued use of fossil fuels will lead to intolerable global warming owing to the greenhouse effect. The oil-producing countries should therefore use the remaining oil for their own survival, and hence the oil supply will decline showing a maximum within 10 to 15 years. Indonesia declared on 26 January 2012 that they would place the priority for domestic oil consumption ahead of oil exportation.
Figure 4

Change in recent energy consumption and future prospects of the world energy demand. The energy consumption over a recent period of 30 years [1] and future prospects of the world energy demand estimated under the assumption of a continued rise in the rate of energy consumption evaluated over the period from 1990 to 2010 and the anticipated years of exhaustion of world reserves of fossil fuels [1] and uranium [2].

For the moment, the purchase of oil, natural gas, and coal, as well as uranium has practically no trade limitation, and thus the motivation to urgently develop an economically viable system of renewable energy production remains low due to a low expectancy of immediate economic profit. However, looking straight at the reality that the available fuel resources will be exhausted around the middle of the twenty-first century and that the continued use of fossil fuel will lead to intolerable global warming, as demonstrated in Figure 5, we need to establish the technologies to use renewable energy for all people in the whole world to survive and to spread the technologies to the whole world within the next 15 years.
Figure 5

Necessity of establishment and worldwide spread of the technology for the substitution with renewable energy.

The usage of renewable energy

In 2010, renewable electric power, excluding hydroelectric power, reached only about 1.4% of the energy consumed in the whole world. For a long-term sustained survival of human beings over the globe, we have to substitute 100% of this energy with renewable energy. There are sufficient renewable energy sources on our planet. For example, in 2010, the total energy consumed worldwide was 538.66 × 1018 J year-1. The corresponding amount of energy can be generated in the form of electricity by photovoltaic cells with an energy conversion efficiency of 15% in a desert area supplying a solar intensity of 1,000 Wm-2 when they were operated 8 h per day and employed only 2.11% of the area of the main deserts on the Earth. This estimate is rather encouraging because it indicates that we can survive on our planet.

The technologies of converting different types of renewable energy sources to electric power have already been developed. The inherent disadvantage of renewable energy sources in general is their instability with fluctuation with time. Thus, when electricity generated by renewable energy sources is directly integrated in the existing electricity supply network system, an undesirable frequency fluctuation of the supplied alternating current (AC) is inevitable. In modern industry, an AC electric power supply with a frequency fluctuation margin of ± 0.2 Hz is claimed to be unacceptable [3]. In Japan, the frequency fluctuation margin of AC electricity supplied to the customer is set at ±0.2 Hz by all the electric power supply companies excluding Hokkaido Electric Power Company, which sets the margin at ±0.3 Hz [3]. According to an estimate made by Hokkaido Electric Power Company [4], the frequency error margin of ±0.3 Hz cannot be held when electricity generated by wind exceeds 250 MW (4.8% of the maximum total power in the network). As such, it is difficult to integrate electricity generated by renewable energy sources with its inherently fluctuating nature exceeding about 5% of the maximum instantaneous power output in the existing electricity supply grid. Therefore, the electric energy generated by intermittent and fluctuating renewable sources should be converted into some form of fuel.

Global carbon dioxide recycling

As early as the 1970s, we had been dreaming to supply hydrogen to all people in the whole world, generating hydrogen by seawater electrolysis using the renewable energy origin electricity. However, we understood that there exists no infrastructure for a mass transportation of hydrogen and no combustion technology for hydrogen. Thus, for establishing renewable-energy-fuelled communities worldwide, we need to convert the energy generated by renewable energy sources to some form of fuel material for which the combustion technology as well as the mass transportation infrastructures have been established.

More than two decades ago, the authors created a catalyst that converted CO2 and H2 to methane (CH4) with an almost 100% CH4 selectivity [5]. Methane is the main constituent of natural gas, for which both the efficient mass transportation infrastructures and the combustion technologies have been well established. Therefore, we proposed global CO2 recycling on the basis of the discovery of this catalyst [6]. The sequence of energy conversion in the proposed system is as follows:
  1. (i)

    Energy necessary for all people in the whole world is converted to electricity from solar energy in deserts.

  2. (ii)

    The electricity is used for H2 production by seawater electrolysis in plants installed along the coasts near the deserts.

  3. (iii)

    H2 is converted to CH4 by the reaction with CO2 in the plants next to the electrolyzers.

  4. (iv)

    Using the available transportation infrastructure, the generated CH4 is sent to the areas of consumption.


The only difference from the current practice is that CO2 should be captured from the chimney and be sent to the place where the electricity is available from renewable energy. If this is realized, we can use solar energy forever, using CO2 as the feedstock without emitting it into the atmosphere.

An industrial technology for the conversion of renewable energy sources to electricity is available, and the infrastructures for CH4 transportation and combustion technologies have been developed. Capturing of CO2 gas from the chimney has also been proven to be industrially viable. The properties of liquefied CO2 are comparable to those of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and therefore the transportation of the liquefied CO2 is possible. Thus, the realization of the global CO2 recycling can be performed through the establishment of the technologies to yield H2 by seawater electrolysis and to produce CH4 by the reaction of H2 with CO2.

Key materials for global carbon dioxide recycling

The key materials toward the realization of a global CO2 recycling are the cathode and anode for seawater electrolysis and a catalyst for the conversion of H2 to CH4 through the reaction with CO2.


We need a cathode consisting of inexpensive elements and having a high activity comparable of platinum black. We have succeeded in creating active and durable alloy cathodes by electrodeposition [7]. The key elements were iron and carbon. Figure 6 presents the cathodic polarization curves of the electrodeposited metals and alloys for hydrogen formation. Nickel was stable but less active. Iron was more active than nickel, and the Ni-Fe alloy was more active than iron. When iron and carbon were added to nickel, the activity becomes remarkably high. The change in Tafel slope (∂E/∂log i) suggests that the hydrogen evolution on the Ni-Fe-C alloy cathodes was mechanistically fastest. The hydrogen evolution reaction (1) consists of two series of elemental reactions (2) + (3) or (2) + (4):
2 H 2 O + 2 e H 2 + 2 O H 2 H + + 2 e H 2
H 2 O + e H ads + O H H + + e H ads
2 H ads H 2
H ads + H 2 O + e H 2 + O H H + + H ads + e H 2
Figure 6

Galvanostatic polarization curves of electrodeposited metals and alloys in an 8 M NaOH solution at 90°C [[7]]. Alloy compositions in atomic percent are written in the figure.

where Hads is a hydrogen atom formed by proton discharge and is adsorbed on the cathode surface. On the assumption of the coverage of Hads, θ and the transfer coefficient θ as < < 1 and α = 1/2, the rate determining reaction, the Tafel slope and corresponding electrode are summarized in Table 1. If the formation of Hads (2) is sufficiently fast due to the high density of the active surface sites on the cathode and due to the fast charge transfer from the cathode to proton, the H2 molecule release by meeting two hydrogen atoms together (3) is the rate-determining step such as on Ni-Fe-C, but if the proton discharge (2) is slower because of lower density of the active sites, the reaction (2) is the rate-determining step. Thus, we could get the Ni-Fe-C electrode with the mechanistically fastest hydrogen formation due to the high density of the active surface sites, and due to the fast charge transfer from the cathode to proton, we found that the significant charge transfer from nickel to iron by the addition of iron and carbon to nickel is responsible for the remarkable acceleration of proton discharge to form hydrogen atoms adsorbed on the cathode surface.
Table 1

The rate-determining reaction and Tafel slope at 90°C

Rate-determining reaction

Tafel slope, (∂E/∂logi)/mV decade−1

Electrode shown in Figure6



Ni, Fe, Ni-Fe







These cathodes with mechanistically highest activity made of Ni-based alloys or Co-based alloys [8] can be used not only for direct seawater electrolysis but also for high-temperature alkali water electrolysis.

Anode materials for seawater electrolysis

Industrial electrolysis of NaCl solutions in either the chlor-alkali industry or sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) production has been conducted for the formation of chlorine (Cl2) on the anode. However, in seawater electrolysis for massive amounts of H2 production, the Cl2 formation on the anode should be avoided. An anode material to form oxygen in place of Cl2 is required to produce H2 by seawater electrolysis. This concern has been solved by developing special anodes bearing single phase multiple oxides consisting mainly of Mn containing also Mo, W, Sn, and/or Fe as active electrocatalysts [9]-[12]. An example is shown in Figure 7[10]. When MnO2 was used as the electrocatalyst, about 92% of electricity was consumed for oxygen evolution at the current density of 1,000 Am−2 in 0.5 M NaCl but 8% of electricity was employed for chlorine evolution. However, when small fractions of manganese were substituted with molybdenum, a 100% oxygen evolution was attained. An improvement of the anode led to the realization of the anode life exceeding 4,200 h at the current density of 1,000 Am−2 in a 0.5 M NaCl solution of pH 1 [13].
Figure 7

Oxygen evolution efficiency of MnO 2 and Mn 1− x Mo x O 2+x in 0.5 M NaCl of pH 12 at 30°C and 1,000 Am −2 [[10]].

The direct seawater electrolysis for the generation of hydrogen is certainly a clean option of acquiring an energy source, but there are numerous technical problems to be solved. In terms of energy consumption at present, this direct seawater electrolysis cannot compete with the high-temperature alkali water electrolysis undertaken for desalinated seawater. Therefore, at the moment, for a large-scale industrial plant, the hot alkali water electrolysis is preferred against direct seawater electrolysis. For the construction of a new hot alkali water electrolyzer, a study of an anode and a cathode attaining the mechanistically highest activities even at 6,000 Am-2 in 30 wt % KOH solution at 90°C is in progress.

Methanation of carbon dioxide

Catalyst for COmethanation
Our objective was to form CH4 very rapidly by the reaction of CO2 with H2 without forming a toxic by-product such as CO through the reaction
C O 2 + 4 H 2 C H 4 + 2 H 2 O
When we used amorphous Ni-Zr alloys as the catalyst precursor for the reaction of CO2 with H2, the CO2 conversion occurred rapidly as has been demonstrated in Figure 8[5]. The methane selectivity of the Ni-Zr catalyst was almost 100% in the temperature range of 200°C to 300°C, as shown in Figure 9[5]. When the amorphous Ni-Zr alloy catalyst precursor was exposed to a CO2:H2 = 1:4 mixture at a temperature in the range of 200°C to 300°C, zirconium was selectively oxidized and converted to ZrO2, while the most of nickel remains in the metallic state, with a consequent formation of the catalyst consisting of nickel supported on ZrO2. In practice, such a catalyst can be produced from the amorphous Ni-Zr alloy precursor through oxidation in air and a subsequent reduction in a H2 atmosphere. At a temperature of around 200°C to 300°C for the catalytic reaction, the thermodynamically stable phase of ZrO2 is monoclinic, but a considerable fraction of tetragonal ZrO2 has been found from the amorphous Ni-Zr precursor, and Ni supported by tetragonal ZrO2 has possessed a high catalytic function [14]. The tetragonal ZrO2 has been identified as the double oxide in which Ni2+ ions have also been included during the formation of a ZrO2 lattice by the oxidation of zirconium in the Ni-Zr alloys while occupying the lattice points of Zr4+ in the ZrO2 lattice. As a rule, the higher the nickel content in the amorphous Ni-Zr precursor, the higher is the fraction of tetragonal ZrO2-type double oxide and the higher is the catalytic activity [15]. When the nickel content of the Ni-Zr precursor is, however, excessively high, an unfavorable nickel agglomeration proceeds on the catalyst surface and leads to a loss of the active site of the catalyst, that is, nickel atoms on the surface of the ZrO2-type double oxide.
Figure 8

Rate of CO 2 conversion in CO 2 +4H 2 on catalyst precursors of amorphous alloys [[5]]. Amorphous alloy compositions are written in the figure in atomic percent.
Figure 9

The selectivity of products during a CO 2 conversion in CO 2 +4H 2 on amorphous alloy catalyst precursors [[5]]. The products are written in the figure.

It is ideal if the fraction of the tetragonal ZrO2 type oxide rises without increasing the proportion of nickel in the amorphous Ni-Zr precursor. It is known empirically that the tetragonal ZrO2-type double oxide is stabilized through a partial replacement of Zr4+ by metal ions with rare earth elements and divalent Ca2+ and Mg2+ as well as Ni2+. In fact, we managed to raise the catalytic activity of the Ni/tetragonal ZrO2-type oxide catalyst by adding rare earth elements to the amorphous Ni-Zr precursor, as has been illustrated in Figure 10[16]. We [17] also demonstrated that the catalyst developed from the amorphous Ni-Zr-Sm precursor promoted the methanation of CO preferentially for a gas mixture of CO, CO2, and H2 as shown in Figure 11.
Figure 10

CO 2 conversion in CO 2 + 4H 2 on catalyst precursors of amorphous Ni-Zr-rare earth element alloys [[16]]. Amorphous alloy compositions are written in the figure in atomic percent.
Figure 11

Conversion of the gas mixture of H 2 -CO-CO 2 on amorphous Ni-35Zr-5Sm alloy precursor [[17]].

Catalyst for mass production

As has been reviewed above, it was confirmed by laboratory investigations that nickel supported by the tetragonal ZrO2-type double oxide formed from the amorphous Ni-Zr alloy precursors was an efficient catalyst for CO2 methanation. However, in general, amorphous alloys are not suitable for mass production of an industrial catalyst. As mentioned above, the essential factor for the high catalytic activity of CO2 methanation was not the amorphous structure but the presence of the tetragonal ZrO2-type multiple oxide containing extra cations of a lower valence than Zr4+. Hence, we synthesized the tetragonal ZrO2-type double oxide by the calcination of a mixture of zirconia hydrosol with a salt of rare earth elements and then by the impregnation of nickel on the tetragonal ZrO2-type double oxide. The catalyst prepared in such way was proved to act satisfactorily as a catalyst for CO2 methanation [18].

Aiming at a further simplification of the catalyst preparation process, we calcined a mixture of zirconia hydrosol, rare earth element salt, and nickel salt to obtain a mixture of the tetragonal ZrO2-type triple oxide and NiO. After this, surface NiO was reduced by H2 to prepare metallic nickel supported by the tetragonal ZrO2 type oxide. The Ni supported by the tetragonal Zr1 x - ySm x Ni y O2 − 0.5x − y catalysts possessed better catalytic activity than the catalysts formed from amorphous alloys [19].

In conclusion, the proposed procedure starting from the calcination of a mixture of zirconia hydrosol, Ni salt, and a salt of cation stabilizing the tetragonal ZrO2 structure to form an oxide mixture of NiO and a tetragonal ZrO2 type multiple oxide, and finishing with a final reduction of surface NiO to form metallic nickel on the surface has proven to be ideal and promising for the mass production of the desired catalyst for CO2 methanation.

In this connection, the use of rare elements such as rare earth elements is not favorable for supplying fuel to the whole world. Instead of rare earth elements, the stabilization of the tetragonal ZrO2-type multiple oxide could be realized by the addition of Ca2+ or Mg2+. The authors have already found that the CO2 methanation activity of the best Ni-Zr-Ca catalyst prepared by the calcination of a mixture of zirconia hydrosol with CaSO4 and NiSO4 is higher than that of the best Ni-Zr-Sm catalyst.

Toward the industrialization of global carbon dioxide recycling

Based on the successful developments of key materials, we have installed a prototype plant of global CO2 recycling consisting of a photovoltaic cell, an electrolyzer, a CO2 methanation system, and a CH4 combustor from which CO2 is sent back to the CO2 methanation system, over the rooftop of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University in 1995, as has been presented in Figure 12. This small-scale plant confirms that as long as solar energy is available, we can use solar energy in global CO2 recycling in distant combustion systems in the form of CH4 and do not emit CO2 into the atmosphere but can use CO2 repeatedly as a feedstock.
Figure 12

A prototype plant of global CO 2 recycling on the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University built in 1995.

In 2003, a pilot plant on an industrial scale has been installed at the Tohoku Institute of Technology that was capable of generating H2 at a rate of 4 Nm3 h−1 and CH4 at a rate of 1 Nm3 h−1, as has been shown in Figure 13.
Figure 13

Pilot plants for production of H 2 by seawater electrolysis and CH 4 by the reaction of H 2 and CO 2 . The plants were built at the Tohoku Institute of Technology in 2003.


The basic technologies for realizing global CO2 recycling have already been in our hands. However, natural gas is readily available as a primary energy source nowadays but our methane is a quaternary energy formed by the conversion from solar energy via electricity and hydrogen. Each conversion requires cost, and hence our methane cannot compete at present with natural gas. However, as has been pointed out at the beginning of this review, the exhaustion of energy resources on the Earth is inevitable in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is anticipated that in 15 to 20 years, countries possessing oil resources will start imposing limitations on the exports of their resources for their own survival. To face this severe reality straightforwardly, we have to develop alternative means to acquire energy on a large scale to sustain prosperity of our society. To the authors' knowledge, the proposed global CO2 recycling system is the most convenient alternative to acquire massive amounts of energy from renewable resources without being dependent on fossil or fissile mineral resources.

The authors will continue to invest research efforts to improve the key materials and systems for the global CO2 recycling and to develop large-scale industrial plants based on this concept. Japanese and foreign firms have formed a joint development for the industrialization of global CO2 recycling plants in which they pay a particular attention to work without precious metals and rare elements. For a worldwide spread of technologies for the solution of global energy and related problems, we should never use precious metals and rare elements, considering always the total world reserves of the necessary elements for the spread of systems. Furthermore, we have succeeded in obtaining the maximum amount of methane from biomass by a combination of CO and CO2 methanation as well as a water-gas shift reaction of biomass-based syngas on our catalyst.

Authors' contributions

This is the review of work done by the groups of KH for 25 years, to which several tens of scientists and engineers have been contributing. The names of authors listed in this article are now mostly contributing to the work and they read and approved the final manuscript.


Authors’ Affiliations

Tohoku Institute of Technology
Hitachi Zosen Corporation


  1. (2013 version), [] (2013 version)
  2. (2012 version), [] (2012 version)
  3. (Tokyo Electric Power Company, 2003), [] (Tokyo Electric Power Company, 2003)
  4. Nakamura K (2003) , [] Nakamura K (2003)
  5. Habazaki H, Tada T, Wakuda K, Kawashima A, Asami K, Hashimoto K: Amorphous iron group metal-valve metal alloy catalysts for hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. In Corrosion, electrochemistry and catalysis of metastable metals and intermetallics. Edited by: Clayton CR, Hashimoto K. The Electrochemical Society, Princeton; 1993:393–404.Google Scholar
  6. Hashimoto K: Green materials - materials for global atmosphere conservation and abundant energy supply. Kinzoku (Materials Science & Technology) 63:5–10. AGNE Gijutsu Center, Tokyo; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Meguro S, Sasaki T, Katagiri H, Habazaki H, Kawashima A, Sakaki T, Hashimoto K: Electrodeposited Ni-Fe-C cathodes for hydrogen evolution. J Electrochem Soc 2000, 147: 3003–3009. 10.1149/1.1393639View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zabinski PR, Meguro S, Asami K, Hashimoto K: Electrodeposited Co-Fe and Co-Fe-C alloys for hydrogen evolution in a hot 8 M NaOH solution. Mater Trans 2003, 44: 2350–2355. 10.2320/matertrans.44.2350View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Izumiya K, Akiyama E, Habazaki H, Kumagai N, Kawashima A, Hashimoto K: Anodically deposited manganese oxide and manganese-tungsten oxide electrodes for oxygen evolution from seawater. Electrochim Acta 1998, 43: 3303–3321. 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00075-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujimura K, Izumiya K, Kawashima A, Habazaki H, Akiyama E, Kumagai N, Hashimoto K: Anodically deposited manganese-molybdenum oxide anodes with high selectivity for evolving oxygen in electrolysis of seawater. J Appl Electrochem 1999, 29: 765–771. 10.1023/A:1003492009263Google Scholar
  11. Abdel Ghany NA, Kumagai N, Meguro S, Asami K, Hashimoto K: Oxygen evolution anodes composed of anodically deposited Mn-Mo-Fe oxides for seawater electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 2002, 48: 21–28. 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00539-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Moneim AA, Kumagai N, Asami K, Hashimoto K: New nanocrystalline manganese-molybdenum-tin oxide anodes for oxygen evolution in seawater electrolysis. ECS Trans 2006, 1(4):491–497.Google Scholar
  13. Kato Z, Kumagai N, Izumiya K, Hashimoto K: Enhancement of durability of oxygen evolution anode in seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 2011, 257: 8230–8236. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yamasaki M, Habazaki H, Yoshida T, Akiyama E, Kawashima A, Asami K, Hashimoto K: Composition dependence of the CO2 methanation activity of Ni/ZrO2 catalysts prepared from amorphous Ni-Zr alloy precursors. Appl Catal A, General 1997, 163: 187–197. 10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00142-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamasaki M, Habazaki H, Yoshida T, Komori M, Shimamura K, Akiyama E, Kawashima A, Asami K, Hashimoto K: Characterization of CO2 methanation catalysts prepared from amorphous Ni-Zr and Ni-Zr-rare earth element alloys. Studies in Surf Sci Catal 1998, 114: 451–454. 10.1016/S0167-2991(98)80793-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Habazaki H, Yoshida T, Yamasaki M, Komori M, Shimamura K, Akiyama E, Kawashima A, Hashimoto K: Methanation of carbon dioxide on catalysts derived from amorphous Ni-Zr-rare earth element alloys. Studies in Surf Sci Catal 1998, 114: 261–266. 10.1016/S0167-2991(98)80754-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Habazaki H, Yamasaki M, Zhang B-P, Kawashima A, Kohno S, Takai T, Hashimoto K: Co-methanation of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide on supported nickel and cobalt catalysts prepared from amorphous alloys. Appl Catal A, General 1998, 172: 131–140. 10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00121-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Habazaki H, Yamasaki M, Kawashima A, Hashimoto K: Methanation of carbon dioxide on Ni/(Zr-Sm)Ox catalysts. Appl Organometallic Chem 2000, 14: 803–808. 10.1002/1099-0739(200012)14:12<803::AID-AOC89>3.0.CO;2-JView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Takano H, Izumiya K, Kumagai N, Hashimoto K: The effect of heat treatment on the performance of the Ni/(Zr-Sm oxide) catalysts for carbon dioxide methanation. Appl Surf Sci 2011, 257: 8171–8176. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.141View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Hashimoto et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.